# LLM Reasoning for Machine Translation: Synthetic Data Generation over Thinking Tokens

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11919 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11919/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 38 of its 110 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04672/) (2022)
- [A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00861/) (2021)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20534/) (2025)
- [Humanity's Last Exam](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14249/) (2025)
- [How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09210/) (2023)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11831/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Can Be Effective Without Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09858/) (2025)
- [LLMs Can Easily Learn to Reason from Demonstrations Structure, not content, is what matters!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07374/) (2025)
- [CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01257/) (2025)
- [SONAR: Sentence-Level Multimodal and Language-Agnostic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11466/) (2023)
- [O1 Replication Journey -- Part 2: Surpassing O1-preview through Simple Distillation, Big Progress or Bitter Lesson?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16489/) (2024)
- [BM25S: Orders of magnitude faster lexical search via eager sparse scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03618/) (2024)
- [MT-R1-Zero: Advancing LLM-based Machine Translation via R1-Zero-like Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10160/) (2025)
- [Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13775/) (2025)
- [Evaluating o1-Like LLMs: Unlocking Reasoning for Translation through Comprehensive Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11544/) (2025)
- [R1-T1: Fully Incentivizing Translation Capability in LLMs via Reasoning Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19735/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Unlocking Reasoning Capability on Machine Translation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14763/) (2026)
- [GRRM: Group Relative Reward Modeling for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14028/) (2026)
- [Physics-Based Benchmarking Metrics for Multimodal Synthetic Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15204/) (2025)
- [Reasoning about In-Context Samples for Machine-Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27036/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have led to new possibilities in terms of problem-solving, through the devising of a natural language thought process prior to answering a query. While their capabilities are well known across mathematics and coding tasks, their impact on the task of machine translation (MT) remains underexplored. In this work, we explore the benefits of the generation of intermediate tokens when performing MT across multiple language pairs of different levels of resourcedness and multiple setups. We find that "thinking tokens" do not help LRMs better perform MT. This result generalizes to models fine-tuned to reason before translating using distilled chain of thought (CoT) inspired by human translators' practices. Specifically, fine-tuning a model with synthetic CoT explanations detailing how to translate step-by-step does not outperform standard input-output fine-tuning. However, constructing the intermediate tokens by combining the outputs of modular translation-specific prompting strategies results in improvements. Our findings underscore that the contribution of intermediate tokens during fine-tuning highly depends on the presence of translation attempts within them. More broadly, our results suggest that using a teacher to refine target translations or to expand parallel corpora is more impactful than distilling their CoT explanations into "thinking" MT models.