# Empirical Study on Robustness and Resilience in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11824 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11824/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 57 of its 97 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 57)

- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02275/) (2017)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01955/) (2021)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11485/) (2018)
- [The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04043/) (2019)
- [Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00909/) (2018)
- [Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.02702/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.02284/) (2017)
- [Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06009/) (2017)
- [Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11180/) (2019)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08938/) (2020)
- [Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10615/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07869/) (2020)
- [Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12729/) (2020)
- [Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11251/) (2021)
- [FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06709/) (2020)
- [Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06257/) (2021)
- [Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09184/) (2019)
- [Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06748/) (2017)
- [What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05990/) (2020)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03632/) (2017)
- [Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08452/) (2021)
- [A Finite Time Analysis of Two Time-Scale Actor Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01350/) (2020)
- [SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07489/) (2022)
- [Towards Human-Level Bimanual Dexterous Manipulation with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08686/) (2022)
- [Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.06452/) (2017)
- [Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02416/) (2024)
- [Robust Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Model Misspecification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07516/) (2019)
- [Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09870/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Online Security Learning in Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems under Hidden Byzantine Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06520/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), it is a common practice to tune hyperparameters in ideal simulated environments to maximize cooperative performance. However, policies tuned for cooperation often fail to maintain robustness and resilience under real-world uncertainties. Building trustworthy MARL systems requires a deep understanding of robustness, which ensures stability under uncertainties, and resilience, the ability to recover from disruptions--a concept extensively studied in control systems but largely overlooked in MARL. In this paper, we present a large-scale empirical study comprising over 82,620 experiments to evaluate cooperation, robustness, and resilience in MARL across 4 real-world environments, 13 uncertainty types, and 15 hyperparameters. Our key findings are: (1) Under mild uncertainty, optimizing cooperation improves robustness and resilience, but this link weakens as perturbations intensify. Robustness and resilience also varies by algorithm and uncertainty type. (2) Robustness and resilience do not generalize across uncertainty modalities or agent scopes: policies robust to action noise for all agents may fail under observation noise on a single agent. (3) Hyperparameter tuning is critical for trustworthy MARL: surprisingly, standard practices like parameter sharing, GAE, and PopArt can hurt robustness, while early stopping, high critic learning rates, and Leaky ReLU consistently help. By optimizing hyperparameters only, we observe substantial improvement in cooperation, robustness and resilience across all MARL backbones, with the phenomenon also generalizing to robust MARL methods across these backbones. Code and results available at https://github.com/BUAA-TrustworthyMARL/adv_marl_benchmark .