# Reproducibility: The New Frontier in AI Governance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11595 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11595/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.03530/) (2016)
- [Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04933/) (2017)
- [PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01848/) (2025)
- [Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14921/) (2023)
- [GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10130/) (2023)
- [Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00640/) (2024)
- [Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07218/) (2024)
- [Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02843/) (2024)
- [Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16946/) (2025)
- [An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05137/) (2020)
- [Evolving Scientific Discovery by Unifying Data and Background Knowledge with AI Hilbert](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09474/) (2023)
- [What is Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Research?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10239/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14309/) (2026)
- [A Function-Centric Perspective on Flat and Sharp Minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12451/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI policymakers are responsible for delivering effective governance mechanisms that can provide safe, aligned and trustworthy AI development. However, the information environment offered to policymakers is characterised by an unnecessarily low Signal-To-Noise Ratio, favouring regulatory capture and creating deep uncertainty and divides on which risks should be prioritised from a governance perspective. We posit that the current publication speeds in AI combined with the lack of strong scientific standards, via weak reproducibility protocols, effectively erodes the power of policymakers to enact meaningful policy and governance protocols. Our paper outlines how AI research could adopt stricter reproducibility guidelines to assist governance endeavours and improve consensus on the AI risk landscape. We evaluate the forthcoming reproducibility crisis within AI research through the lens of crises in other scientific domains; providing a commentary on how adopting preregistration, increased statistical power and negative result publication reproducibility protocols can enable effective AI governance. While we maintain that AI governance must be reactive due to AI's significant societal implications we argue that policymakers and governments must consider reproducibility protocols as a core tool in the governance arsenal and demand higher standards for AI research. Code to replicate data and figures: https://github.com/IFMW01/reproducibility-the-new-frontier-in-ai-governance
