# Not All Bits Are Equal: Scale-Dependent Memory Optimization Strategies for Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10964 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10964/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 34 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)
- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Efficient reasoning and agent inference](https://mlsanity.com/inference/efficient-reasoning-and-agent-inference/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08691/) (2023)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21787/) (2024)
- [KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cache](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02750/) (2024)
- [Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14701/) (2020)
- [Model Tells You What to Discard: Adaptive KV Cache Compression for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01801/) (2023)
- [LLM-QAT: Data-Free Quantization Aware Training for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17888/) (2023)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17764/) (2024)
- [SqueezeLLM: Dense-and-Sparse Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07629/) (2023)
- [Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00724/) (2024)
- [GEAR: An Efficient KV Cache Compression Recipe for Near-Lossless Generative Inference of LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05527/) (2024)
- [Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05405/) (2024)
- [Scaling Laws for Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04330/) (2024)
- [ZeroQuant-V2: Exploring Post-training Quantization in LLMs from Comprehensive Study to Low Rank Compensation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08302/) (2023)
- [Quantization Hurts Reasoning? An Empirical Study on Quantized Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04823/) (2025)
- [How much do language models memorize?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24832/) (2025)
- [R-KV: Redundancy-aware KV Cache Compression for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24133/) (2025)
- [ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02631/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Value-Aware Stochastic KV Cache Eviction for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03928/) (2026)
- [WaterSIC: Information-Theoretically (Near) Optimal Linear Layer Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04956/) (2026)
- [Spend Bytes on Breadth: Precision-Count Trade-offs for Decode-Time KV Compression in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05685/) (2026)
- [Fewer Bits, More Tries: Recovering Capability Under Memory Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15372/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While 4-bit quantization has emerged as a memory-optimal choice for non-reasoning models and zero-shot tasks across scales, we show that this universal prescription fails for reasoning models, where the KV cache rather than model size can dominate memory. Through systematic experiments across 1,700 inference scenarios on AIME25 and GPQA-Diamond, we find a scale-dependent trade-off: models with an effective size below 8-bit 4B parameters achieve better accuracy by allocating memory to more weights rather than longer generation, while larger models achieve better accuracy by allocating memory to longer generations. This scale threshold also determines when parallel scaling becomes memory-efficient and whether KV cache eviction outperforms KV quantization. Our findings show that memory optimization for LLMs cannot be scale-agnostic, while providing principled guidelines: for small reasoning models, prioritize model capacity over test-time compute, while for larger ones, maximize test-time compute. Our results suggest that optimizing reasoning models for deployment requires fundamentally different strategies from those established for non-reasoning models.