# PAC-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Trains Generalizable Policies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10544 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10544/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [DeepMind Control Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00690/) (2018)
- [User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11216/) (2021)
- [A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.05353/) (2019)
- [Tighter risk certificates for neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12911/) (2020)
- [A Strongly Quasiconvex PAC-Bayesian Bound](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.05610/) (2016)
- [Risk Bounds for the Majority Vote: From a PAC-Bayesian Analysis to a Learning Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.08329/) (2015)
- [Generalization Bounds via Information Density and Conditional Information Density](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08044/) (2020)
- [Trustworthy Reinforcement Learning Against Intrinsic Vulnerabilities: Robustness, Safety, and Generalizability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08025/) (2022)
- [Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00614/) (2022)
- [Improved PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Linear Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03036/) (2019)
- [Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04375/) (2023)
- [Generalization bounds for mixing processes via delayed online-to-PAC conversions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12600/) (2024)
- [Statistical Guarantees for Lifelong Reinforcement Learning using PAC-Bayes Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00401/) (2024)
- [Deep Exploration with PAC-Bayes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03055/) (2024)
- [Wasserstein PAC-Bayes Learning: Exploiting Optimisation Guarantees to Explain Generalisation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07048/) (2023)
- [Empirical PAC-Bayes Bounds for Markov Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20985/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Entanglement as a Structural Complexity Axis: A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalization in Quantum Policies and Value Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.06230/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We derive a novel PAC-Bayesian generalization bound for reinforcement learning that explicitly accounts for Markov dependencies in the data, through the chain's mixing time. This contributes to overcoming challenges in obtaining generalization guarantees for reinforcement learning, where the sequential nature of data breaks the independence assumptions underlying classical bounds. The new bound provides non-vacuous certificates for modern off-policy algorithms such as Soft Actor-Critic. We demonstrate the practical utility of the bound through PB-SAC, a novel algorithm that optimizes the bound during training to guide exploration. Experiments across several continuous control tasks show that the proposed approach provides meaningful confidence certificates while maintaining competitive performance.
