# Hound: Relation-First Knowledge Graphs for Complex-System Reasoning in Security Audits

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09633 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09633/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05427/) (2024)
- [CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14497/) (2024)
- [RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14684/) (2024)
- [We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10279/) (2024)
- [CodexGraph: Bridging Large Language Models and Code Repositories via Code Graph Databases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03910/) (2024)
- [RepoAudit: An Autonomous LLM-Agent for Repository-Level Code Auditing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18160/) (2025)
- [Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19411/) (2025)
- [Code Researcher: Deep Research Agent for Large Systems Code and Commit History](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11060/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models (LLMs) for Source Code Analysis: applications, models and datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17502/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [An Effective and Cost-Efficient Agentic Framework for Ethereum Smart Contract Auditing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17833/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hound introduces a relation-first graph engine that improves system-level reasoning across interrelated components in complex codebases. The agent designs flexible, analyst-defined views with compact annotations (e.g., monetary/value flows, authentication/authorization roles, call graphs, protocol invariants) and uses them to anchor exact retrieval: for any question, it loads precisely the code that matters (often across components) so it can zoom out to system structure and zoom in to the decisive lines. A second contribution is a persistent belief system: long-lived vulnerability hypotheses whose confidence is updated as evidence accrues. The agent employs coverage-versus-intuition planning and a QA finalizer to confirm or reject hypotheses. On a five-project subset of ScaBench[1], Hound improves recall and F1 over a baseline LLM analyzer (micro recall 31.2% vs. 8.3%; F1 14.2% vs. 9.8%) with a modest precision trade-off. We attribute these gains to flexible, relation-first graphs that extend model understanding beyond call/dataflow to abstract aspects, plus the hypothesis-centric loop; code and artifacts are released to support reproduction.