# The Impact of Semantic Pairs on Self-Supervised Representation Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08722 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08722/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07733/) (2020)
- [Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10566/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09882/) (2020)
- [Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04297/) (2020)
- [Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03230/) (2021)
- [How transferable are features in deep neural networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1792/) (2014)
- [VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04906/) (2021)
- [Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.05520/) (2018)
- [What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10243/) (2020)
- [Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01991/) (2019)
- [Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04592/) (2020)
- [Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01028/) (2020)
- [Debiased Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00224/) (2020)
- [With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14548/) (2021)
- [Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04156/) (2021)
- [What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.05659/) (2020)
- [Demystifying Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning: Invariances, Augmentations and Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.13916/) (2020)
- [Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11765/) (2020)
- [Contrastive Learning with Stronger Augmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07713/) (2021)
- [Learning Representations by Predicting Bags of Visual Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12247/) (2020)
- [OBoW: Online Bag-of-Visual-Words Generation for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11552/) (2020)
- [Mean Shift for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07269/) (2021)
- [Conditional Negative Sampling for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02037/) (2020)
- [Contrastive Learning Can Find An Optimal Basis For Approximately View-Invariant Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01883/) (2022)
- [Leverage Your Local and Global Representations: A New Self-Supervised Learning Strategy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.17205/) (2022)
- [Do SSL Models Have D'ej`a Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13850/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Instance discrimination learns visual representations by treating different augmented views of the same image as positive pairs. While this encourages invariance to handcrafted transformations, same-image positives can preserve nuisance correlations such as background, texture, illumination, and object-specific details. Semantic positive pairs, i.e., different same-class instances, may reduce these correlations by presenting objects across diverse contexts. However, previous studies often combine semantic pairs with augmented positives or false neighbors (i.e., incorrectly mapped semantic pairs), making it difficult to isolate the effect of semantic pairing. We present a controlled empirical study of semantic positive pairs for self-supervised representation learning. From ImageNet-1K, we construct two matched subsets: an augmented-pair baseline and a manually curated semantic-pair dataset with the same class composition and training-pair count. We use these datasets to compare representative contrastive and non-contrastive SSL methods under matched training conditions. Across transfer learning and object detection evaluations, semantic-pair pretraining consistently improves generalisation over augmented-pair pretraining. Additional ablations show that semantic pairs induce invariances beyond the standard transformation pipeline. Among the evaluated methods, contrastive learning benefits most strongly from semantic pairs, with SimCLR showing the largest relative improvement. These results clarify the role of semantic positive pairs in SSL and provide guidance for selecting and designing frameworks that can exploit semantic pair information effectively.