# The Digital Mirror: Gender Bias and Occupational Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08628 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08628/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [Scaling up GANs for Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05511/) (2023)
- [Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01963/) (2021)
- [Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03759/) (2022)
- [Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.05345/) (2020)
- [REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07999/) (2020)
- [T2IAT: Measuring Valence and Stereotypical Biases in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00905/) (2023)
- [ViSAGe: A Global-Scale Analysis of Visual Stereotypes in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06310/) (2024)
- [A Friendly Face: Do Text-to-Image Systems Rely on Stereotypes when the Input is Under-Specified?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07159/) (2023)
- [Generative AI for Visualization: State of the Art and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18144/) (2024)
- [Smiling Women Pitching Down: Auditing Representational and Presentational Gender Biases in Image Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10566/) (2023)
- [The Stories We Tell About Data: Media Types for Data-Driven Storytelling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00047/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Toward Trustworthy Portrait Editing: Evaluation of Demographic Misrepresentation in I2I Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16149/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI offers vast opportunities for creating visualisations, such as graphics, videos, and images. However, recent studies around AI-generated visualisations have primarily focused on the creation process and image quality, overlooking representational biases. This study addresses this gap by testing representation biases in AI-generated pictures in an occupational setting and evaluating how two AI image generator tools, DALL-E 3 and Ideogram, compare. Additionally, the study discusses topics such as ageing and emotions in AI-generated images. As AI image tools are becoming more widely used, addressing and mitigating harmful gender biases becomes essential to ensure diverse representation in media and professional settings. In this study, over 750 AI-generated images of occupations were prompted. The thematic analysis results revealed that both DALL-E 3 and Ideogram reinforce traditional gender stereotypes in AI-generated images, although to varying degrees. These findings emphasise that AI visualisation tools risk reinforcing narrow representations. In our discussion section, we propose suggestions for practitioners, individuals and researchers to increase representation when generating images with visible genders.