# First Try Matters: Revisiting the Role of Reflection in Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08308 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08308/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00114/) (2021)
- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13585/) (2025)
- [Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14768/) (2025)
- [ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24864/) (2025)
- [Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18585/) (2025)
- [MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model -- From Pretraining to Posttraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07608/) (2025)
- [Magistral](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10910/) (2025)
- [Understanding Aha Moments: from External Observations to Internal Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02956/) (2025)
- [Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01191/) (2025)
- [100 Days After DeepSeek-R1: A Survey on Replication Studies and More Directions for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00551/) (2025)
- [What Makes a Good Reasoning Chain? Uncovering Structural Patterns in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22148/) (2025)
- [MiroMind-M1: An Open-Source Advancement in Mathematical Reasoning via Context-Aware Multi-Stage Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14683/) (2025)
- [Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.12507/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Neural Chain-of-Thought Search: Searching the Optimal Reasoning Path to Enhance Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11340/) (2026)
- [Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19928/) (2026)
- [Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23989/) (2026)
- [ReasonOps: Operator Segmentation for LLM Reasoning Traces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29192/) (2026)
- [Latent Thoughts Tuning: Bridging Context and Reasoning with Fused Information in Latent Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10229/) (2026)
- [Self-Verification Dilemma: Experience-Driven Suppression of Overused Checking in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03485/) (2026)
- [Think-Reflect-Revise: A Policy-Guided Reflective Framework for Safety Alignment in Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07141/) (2025)
- [Structured Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07180/) (2026)
- [It's the Problem, Not the Path: Budget and Difficulty Confounds in LLM Reasoning Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03436/) (2026)
- [The Two-Stage Decision-Sampling Hypothesis: Understanding the Emergence of Self-Reflection in RL-Trained LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01580/) (2026)
- [Graph-Based Chain-of-Thought Pruning for Reducing Redundant Reflections in Reasoning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05643/) (2026)
- [PathCal: State-Aware Reflection-Marker Calibration for Efficient Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23074/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models have recently demonstrated significant gains in reasoning ability, often attributed to their capacity to generate longer chains of thought and engage in reflective reasoning. However, the contribution of reflections to performance improvement remains unclear. In this paper, we systematically analyze the rollouts of eight reasoning models on five mathematical datasets. We focus on reflective behaviours where the model has already produced an answer but continues reflecting before finalizing its output. Our analysis reveals that reflections are predominantly confirmatory and rarely alter the model's initial answer, a pattern consistent across models and datasets. To understand the role of reflections in training, we construct supervised fine-tuning (SFT) datasets with varying amounts of reflection steps. We observe that training models on rollouts with more reflection steps primarily enhances first-answer correctness rather than the ability to correct initially wrong answers through reflections. This motivates us to propose a question-aware early-stopping method that enhances inference-time token efficiency by stopping the reasoning process once a few plausible candidate answers are generated, thereby reducing unnecessary reflection steps. Motivated by this, we further propose to dynamically truncate the reflections after a candidate answer has appeared during generation, which reduces reasoning tokens by 24.5% across five mathematical datasets, within a 2.9% drop in accuracy.