# An Adaptive Multi Agent Bitcoin Trading System

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08068 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08068/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Financial trading and forecasting agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/financial-trading-and-forecasting-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17564/) (2023)
- [FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10063/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models in Finance: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10723/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models for Financial Applications: Progress, Prospects and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11903/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models in Finance (FinLLMs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02315/) (2024)
- [FinRobot: An Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Financial Applications using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14767/) (2024)
- [Automate Strategy Finding with LLM in Quant Investment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06289/) (2024)
- [LLM-Powered Multi-Agent System for Automated Crypto Portfolio Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00826/) (2025)
- [AI in Investment Analysis: LLMs for Equity Stock Ratings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00856/) (2024)
- [Expect the Unexpected: FailSafe Long Context QA for Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06329/) (2025)
- [Predicting Market Trends with Enhanced Technical Indicator Integration and Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06935/) (2024)
- [Using Sentiment and Technical Analysis to Predict Bitcoin with Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14532/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [AQuA: Recursively Self-Improving Quantitative Trading Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.12841/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a Multi Agent Bitcoin Trading system that utilizes Large Language Models (LLMs) for alpha generation and portfolio management in the cryptocurrencies market. Unlike equities, cryptocurrencies exhibit extreme volatility and are heavily influenced by rapidly shifting market sentiments and regulatory announcements, making them difficult to model using static regression models or neural networks trained solely on historical data. The proposed framework overcomes this by structuring LLMs into specialised agents for technical analysis, sentiment evaluation, decision-making, and performance reflection. The agents improve over time via a novel verbal feedback mechanism where a Reflect agent provides daily and weekly natural-language critiques of trading decisions. These textual evaluations are then injected into future prompts of the agents, allowing them to adjust allocation logic without weight updates or finetuning. Back-testing on Bitcoin price data from July 2024 to April 2025 shows consistent outperformance across market regimes: the Quantitative agent delivered over 30% higher returns in bullish phases and 15% overall gains versus buy-and-hold, while the sentiment-driven agent turned sideways markets from a small loss into a gain of over 100%. Adding weekly feedback further improved total performance by 31% and reduced bearish losses by 10%. The results demonstrate that verbal feedback represents a new, scalable, and low-cost approach of tuning LLMs for financial goals.
