# AgentAsk: Multi-Agent Systems Need to Ask

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07593 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07593/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07924/) (2023)
- [FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05176/) (2023)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05376/) (2023)
- [Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13657/) (2025)
- [Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04180/) (2025)
- [MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01935/) (2025)
- [Modeling Future Conversation Turns to Teach LLMs to Ask Clarifying Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13788/) (2024)
- [Talk Isn't Always Cheap: Understanding Failure Modes in Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05396/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14092/) (2024)
- [ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14565/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14892/) (2026)
- [Evolve as a Team: Collaborative Self-Evolution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29790/) (2026)
- [Structure for Reading, Prose for Writing: Asymmetric Structural Conditioning in Multi-Agent Document Authoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20786/) (2026)
- [The Decomposition Tax: LLM Pipelines Lose Up to 40 Accuracy Points at Their Own Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32825/) (2026)
- [Prospective Interpretation Risk: Principled Communication Control Between LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33885/) (2026)
- [Can Generative AI Automate Data Extraction for Meta-Analysis? A Case Study on Intercropping Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35089/) (2026)
- [BRIDGE: Selective Boundary Repair with Dependency Graph Evidence in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17805/) (2026)
- [From Agents to Edges: Paired Optimization for Multi-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18069/) (2026)
- [Fan Out or Relay? Ownership-Aware Routing for LLM Agents Querying Siloed Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18157/) (2026)
- [BLADE: Auditing Information Use for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18780/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent systems (MAS) built on large language models promise improved problem-solving through collaboration, yet they often fail to consistently outperform strong single-agent baselines due to error propagation at inter-agent message handoffs.In this work, we conduct a systematic empirical analysis of such failures and introduce an edge-level error taxonomy that identifies four dominant error types: Data Gap, Signal Corruption, Referential Drift, and Capability Gap, as primary sources of failure in multi-agent interactions. Building on this taxonomy, we propose AgentAsk, a lightweight clarification module designed to intervene at the edge level in MAS to prevent cascading errors. The module operates by strategically applying minimal clarifications at critical points within the system, improving the accuracy and efficiency of the overall task. AgentAsk is trained to balance the trade-offs between clarification cost, latency, and accuracy, while it is also architecture-agnostic and can be easily integrated into existing systems. Evaluated across five benchmarks, AgentAsk consistently improves accuracy by up to 4.69%, while keeping latency and extra costs below 10% compared to baseline MAS, showcasing its high efficiency and minimal overhead.