# MathRobust-LV: Evaluation of Large Language Models' Robustness to Linguistic Variations in Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06430 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06430/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13787/) (2024)
- [GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19255/) (2024)
- [Teaching Algorithmic Reasoning via In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09066/) (2022)
- [Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17387/) (2025)
- [MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06453/) (2025)
- [A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12023/) (2022)
- [MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18321/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04550/) (2025)
- [Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical and Coding Competency through Ontology-guided Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09395/) (2024)
- [ArithmAttack: Evaluating Robustness of LLMs to Noisy Context in Math Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08203/) (2025)
- [An Investigation of Robustness of LLMs in Mathematical Reasoning: Benchmarking with Mathematically-Equivalent Transformation of Advanced Mathematical Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08833/) (2025)
- [Toward Automated Robustness Evaluation of Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05038/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Robust Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08571/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models excel on math benchmarks, but their math reasoning robustness to linguistic variation is underexplored. While recent work increasingly treats high-difficulty competitions like the IMO as the gold standard for evaluating reasoning, we believe in comprehensive benchmarking of high school-level math problems in real educational settings. We introduce MathRobust-LV, a test set and evaluation methodology that mirrors how instructors rephrase problems across assessments while keeping difficulty constant: we change surface details (names, contexts, variables) while preserving numerical structure and answers. In contrast to prior efforts that alter problem content or emphasize IMO-level tasks, we focus on high-school-level dataset problems at the difficulty level where models are currently deployed in educational settings: tutoring and assessment systems. In these applications, instructors rephrase identical concepts in varied ways, making linguistic robustness essential for reliable deployment. Although MATH data benchmarking is often regarded as saturated, our experiment on 34 models reveals that accuracy declines when moving from the baseline to the variants. These drops are severe for smaller models (9-11%) while stronger models also show measurable degradation. Frontier models like GPT-5, Gemini-2.5pro remain comparatively stable. Our results highlight that robustness to linguistic variation is a fundamental challenge, exposing reasoning vulnerabilities in models.