# Type and Complexity Signals in Multilingual Question Representations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06304 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06304/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.05002/) (2020)
- [What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01070/) (2018)
- [What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06316/) (2019)
- [Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10643/) (2020)
- [Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04207/) (2016)
- [Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03061/) (2020)
- [Glot500: Scaling Multilingual Corpora and Language Models to 500 Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12182/) (2023)
- [Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18923/) (2024)
- [Probing Multilingual Sentence Representations With X-Probe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05061/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This work investigates how a multilingual transformer model represents morphosyntactic properties of questions. We introduce the Question Type and Complexity (QTC) dataset with sentences across seven languages, annotated with type information and complexity metrics including dependency length, tree depth, and lexical density. Our evaluation extends probing methods to regression labels with selectivity controls to quantify gains in generalizability. We compare layer-wise probes on frozen Glot500-m (Imani et al., 2023) representations against subword TF-IDF baselines, and a fine-tuned model. Results show that statistical features classify questions effectively in languages with explicit marking, while neural probes capture fine-grained structural complexity patterns better. We use these results to evaluate when contextual representations outperform statistical baselines and whether parameter updates reduce the availability of pre-trained linguistic information.