# Empirical Comparison of Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Transfer Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05753 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05753/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 40 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Membership inference attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/membership-inference-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07871/) (2017)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [How transferable are features in deep neural networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1792/) (2014)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08232/) (2018)
- [Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11370/) (2019)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06499/) (2021)
- [SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17161/) (2025)
- [ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01246/) (2018)
- [Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03962/) (2018)
- [The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04621/) (2017)
- [Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07853/) (2021)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06539/) (2022)
- [White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11229/) (2019)
- [Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09679/) (2021)
- [Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.15528/) (2020)
- [Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00638/) (2022)
- [Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03262/) (2023)
- [Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14933/) (2022)
- [Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06470/) (2022)
- [Inexact Unlearning Needs More Careful Evaluations to Avoid a False Sense of Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01218/) (2024)
- [Scalable Membership Inference Attacks via Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03694/) (2023)
- [SoK: Membership Inference Attacks on LLMs are Rushing Nowhere (and How to Fix It)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17975/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the emergence of powerful large-scale foundation models, the training paradigm is increasingly shifting from from-scratch training to transfer learning. This enables high utility training with small, domain-specific datasets typical in sensitive applications. Membership inference attacks (MIAs) provide an empirical estimate of the privacy leakage by machine learning models. Yet, prior assessments of MIAs against models fine-tuned with transfer learning rely on a small subset of possible attacks. We address this by comparing performance of diverse MIAs in transfer learning settings to help practitioners identify the most efficient attacks for privacy risk evaluation. We find that attack efficacy decreases with the increase in training data for score-based MIAs. We find that there is no one MIA which captures all privacy risks in models trained with transfer learning. While the Likelihood Ratio Attack (LiRA) demonstrates superior performance across most experimental scenarios, the Inverse Hessian Attack (IHA) proves to be more effective against models fine-tuned on PatchCamelyon dataset in high data regime.