# MADIAVE: Multi-Agent Debate for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05611 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05611/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06782/) (2024)
- [BLIVA: A Simple Multimodal LLM for Better Handling of Text-Rich Visual Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09936/) (2023)
- [Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04049/) (2024)
- [OpenTag: Open Attribute Value Extraction from Product Profiles [Deep Learning, Active Learning, Named Entity Recognition]](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01264/) (2018)
- [MAVE: A Product Dataset for Multi-source Attribute Value Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08663/) (2021)
- [From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18959/) (2025)
- [Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09477/) (2025)
- [AdaTag: Multi-Attribute Value Extraction from Product Profiles with Adaptive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02318/) (2021)
- [LLM-Based Human-Agent Collaboration and Interaction Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00753/) (2025)
- [Multi-Agent Autonomous Driving Systems with Large Language Models: A Survey of Recent Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16804/) (2025)
- [ExtractGPT: Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Product Attribute Value Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12537/) (2023)
- [PAM: Understanding Product Images in Cross Product Category Attribute Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04630/) (2021)
- [ImplicitAVE: An Open-Source Dataset and Multimodal LLMs Benchmark for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15592/) (2024)
- [EIVEN: Efficient Implicit Attribute Value Extraction using Multimodal LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08886/) (2024)
- [PSG-Agent: Personality-Aware Safety Guardrail for LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23614/) (2025)
- [A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09420/) (2025)
- [Multi-Label Zero-Shot Product Attribute-Value Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08802/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Comparison of Generative Approaches for Product Attribute-Value Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01137/) (2024)
- [TACLR: A Scalable and Efficient Retrieval-based Method for Industrial Product Attribute Value Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03835/) (2025)
- [Identifying Factual Inconsistencies in Summaries: Grounding LLM Inference via Task Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12821/) (2024)
- [EAVE: Efficient Product Attribute Value Extraction via Lightweight Sparse-layer Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06839/) (2024)
- [Exploring Large Language Models for Product Attribute Value Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12695/) (2024)
- [Visual Zero-Shot E-Commerce Product Attribute Value Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15979/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Deep Research with Open-Domain Evaluation and Multi-Stage Guardrails for Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10994/) (2025)
- [TRACE: Agentic Catalog Enrichment with Multi-source Evidence Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20844/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Implicit Attribute Value Extraction (AVE) is essential for accurately representing products in e-commerce, as it infers latent attributes from multimodal data. Despite advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), implicit AVE remains challenging due to the complexity of multidimensional data and gaps in vision-text understanding. In this work, we introduce MADIAVE, a multi-agent debate framework that employs multiple MLLM agents to iteratively refine inferences. Through a series of debate rounds, agents verify and update each other's responses, thereby improving inference performance and robustness. Experiments on the ImplicitAVE dataset demonstrate that even a few rounds of debate significantly boost accuracy, especially for attributes with initially low performance. We systematically evaluate various debate configurations, including identical or different MLLM agents, and analyze how debate rounds affect convergence dynamics. Our findings highlight the potential of multi-agent debate strategies to address the limitations of single-agent approaches and offer a scalable solution for implicit AVE in multimodal e-commerce.