# Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04886 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04886/

## Key facts

- Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01680/) (2024)
- [GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19457/) (2025)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desire](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04166/) (2023)
- [ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06559/) (2024)
- [Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10934/) (2024)
- [Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00212/) (2025)
- [MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01935/) (2025)
- [MDAgents: An Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Medical Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15155/) (2024)
- [AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15711/) (2024)
- [AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Calls](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04253/) (2024)
- [FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06567/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02533/) (2025)
- [Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07061/) (2024)
- [A Review of Prominent Paradigms for LLM-Based Agents: Tool Use (Including RAG), Planning, and Feedback Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05804/) (2024)
- [TIGERScore: Towards Building Explainable Metric for All Text Generation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00752/) (2023)
- [Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03602/) (2024)
- [Step Back to Leap Forward: Self-Backtracking for Boosting Reasoning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04404/) (2025)
- [Contrastive Error Attribution for Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10722/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking LLMs' Swarm intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04364/) (2025)
- [Synchronous Faithfulness Monitoring for Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13692/) (2024)
- [Tournament of Prompts: Evolving LLM Instructions Through Structured Debates and Elo Ratings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00178/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Seeing the Whole Elephant: A Benchmark for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22708/) (2026)
- [DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06749/) (2025)
- [From Flat Logs to Causal Graphs: Hierarchical Failure Attribution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.23701/) (2026)
- [Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09996/) (2026)
- [FALAT: Tracing Failures in LLM Agent Trajectories via Dependency-Guided Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00765/) (2026)
- [Tracing Agentic Failure from the Flow of Success](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.12747/) (2026)
- [TRAJDEBUG: Tracing Error Lifecycle to Identify Critical Failures in Long-Horizon Agent Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06346/) (2026)
- [MASPrism: Lightweight Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems Using Prefill-Stage Signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07509/) (2026)
- [Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14892/) (2026)
- [VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17467/) (2026)
- [Towards Self-Improving Error Diagnosis in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17658/) (2026)
- [FAMA: Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic Framework for Open-Source LLMs in Interactive Tool Use Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25135/) (2026)
- [Conformal Agent Error Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06788/) (2026)
- [Evolve as a Team: Collaborative Self-Evolution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29790/) (2026)
- [StepFinder: A Temporal Semantic Framework for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03467/) (2026)
- [EDGE: Error Dependency Graph-Guided Multi-Error Attribution in Multi-Agent LLM Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01360/) (2026)
- [Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07989/) (2026)
- [LongRCA Bench: Root-Cause Localization in Long-Horizon Agent Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15242/) (2026)
- [CockpitHAT: Dependency-Graph-Driven Hierarchical Attribution for Embodied Multi-Agent Cockpits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01805/) (2026)
- [Adaptive Influence Graphs for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24361/) (2026)
- [Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29646/) (2026)
- [Diagnosis-Driven Automatic Repair for Agentic Workflow via Symbolic Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02882/) (2026)
- [Beyond LLM-Based Reasoning: Lightweight GNNs for Agent Failure Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.18575/) (2026)
- [From Hand-Crafted to LLM-Based Variation Operators in Metaheuristics: A Tutorial](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.31649/) (2026)
- [Know the Shape, Find the Fault: Topology-Conditioned Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.10126/) (2026)
- [Error-Propagation Modeling for Failure Attribution in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11600/) (2026)
- [Can Failed Trajectories Reveal Where Agents Go Wrong? Agentic Failure Attribution Without Step-Level Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13105/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Error attribution in Large Language Model (LLM) multi-agent systems presents a significant challenge in debugging and improving collaborative AI systems. Current approaches to pinpointing agent and step level failures in interaction traces - whether using all-at-once evaluation, step-by-step analysis, or binary search - fall short when analyzing complex patterns, struggling with both accuracy and consistency. We present ECHO (Error attribution through Contextual Hierarchy and Objective consensus analysis), a novel algorithm that combines hierarchical context representation, objective analysis-based evaluation, and consensus voting to improve error attribution accuracy. Our approach leverages a positional-based leveling of contextual understanding while maintaining objective evaluation criteria, ultimately reaching conclusions through a consensus mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that ECHO outperforms existing methods across various multi-agent interaction scenarios, showing particular strength in cases involving subtle reasoning errors and complex interdependencies. Our findings suggest that leveraging these concepts of structured, hierarchical context representation combined with consensus-based objective decision-making, provides a more robust framework for error attribution in multi-agent systems.