# Causality-aware Graph Aggregation Weight Estimator for Popularity Debiasing in Top-K Recommendation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04502 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04502/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.00670/) (2016)
- [LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02126/) (2020)
- [DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10903/) (2019)
- [Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.08108/) (2019)
- [Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05814/) (2018)
- [Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05352/) (2016)
- [Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03240/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Causal Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02770/) (2020)
- [Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04468/) (2016)
- [Disentangled Graph Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01764/) (2020)
- [Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11671/) (2019)
- [Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06067/) (2021)
- [Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15363/) (2020)
- [Causal Inference in Recommender Systems: A Survey and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12397/) (2022)
- [Long-tail Session-based Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12329/) (2020)
- [ESAM: Discriminative Domain Adaptation with Non-Displayed Items to Improve Long-Tail Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10545/) (2020)
- [The Simpson's Paradox in the Offline Evaluation of Recommendation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08912/) (2021)
- [Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07122/) (2021)
- [Causal Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01868/) (2021)
- [Investigating Accuracy-Novelty Performance for Graph-based Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12326/) (2022)
- [General Debiasing for Graph-based Collaborative Filtering via Adversarial Graph Dropout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13769/) (2024)
- [Disentangling Popularity and Quality: An Edge Classification Approach for Fair Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15699/) (2025)
- [Neural Causal Graph Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04384/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Graph-based recommender systems leverage neighborhood aggregation to generate node representations, which is highly sensitive to popularity bias, resulting in an echo effect during information propagation. Existing graph-based debiasing solutions refine the aggregation process with attempts such as edge reconstruction or weight adjustment. However, these methods remain inadequate in fully alleviating popularity bias. Specifically, this is because 1) they provide no insights into graph aggregation rationality, thus lacking an optimality guarantee; 2) they fail to well balance the training and debiasing process, which undermines the effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to mitigate popularity bias through rational modeling of the graph aggregation process. We reveal that graph aggregation is a special form of backdoor adjustment in causal inference, where the aggregation weight corresponds to the historical interaction likelihood distribution. Based on this insight, we devise an encoder-decoder architecture, namely Causality-aware Graph Aggregation Weight Estimator for Debiasing (CAGED), to approximate the unbiased aggregation weight by optimizing the evidence lower bound of the interaction likelihood. In order to enhance the debiasing effectiveness during early training stages, we further design a momentum update strategy that incrementally refines the aggregation weight matrix. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate that CAGED outperforms existing graph-based debiasing methods. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/QueYork/CAGED.
