# Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence: Dual-Dial Control for Reliable LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04488 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04488/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13657/) (2025)
- [Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04692/) (2024)
- [AI safety via debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00899/) (2018)
- [Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09797/) (2023)
- [On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04622/) (2024)
- [Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17536/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Mixture-of-Agents: Is Mixing Different Large Language Models Beneficial?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00674/) (2025)
- [Prompting Large Language Models With the Socratic Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08769/) (2023)
- [A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07954/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Inverse-Free Wilson Loops for Transformers: A Practical Diagnostic for Invariance and Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08648/) (2025)
- [Meta-Moderator: Empowering Multi-Agent Debate with Meta-Cognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23029/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent debate often wastes compute by using a fixed adversarial stance, aggregating without deliberation, or stopping on heuristics. We introduce MACI, an active controller with two independent dials that decouple information from behavior: an information dial that gates evidence by quality, and a behavior dial that schedules contentiousness from exploration to consolidation. A moderator tracks disagreement, overlap, evidence quality, and argument quality, and halts when gains plateau. We provide theory-lite guarantees for nonincreasing dispersion and provable termination, with a budget-feasible scheduler. Across clinical diagnosis and news-bias tasks, MACI improves accuracy and calibration while reducing tokens, and converts residual uncertainty into precision RAG plans that specify what to retrieve next. We use a cross-family LLM judge (CRIT) as a conservative soft weight and stop signal, validated for order invariance and judge-swap stability; stability depends on using high-capability judges. MACI turns debate into a budget-aware, measurable, and provably terminating controller.