# LLM-Based Data Science Agents: A Survey of Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04023 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04023/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 5 of its 79 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07981/) (2025)
- [ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04172/) (2024)
- [Perception Tokens Enhance Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03548/) (2024)
- [ChartInstruct: Instruction Tuning for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09028/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23587/) (2025)
- [DSGym: A Holistic Framework for Evaluating and Training Data Science Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16344/) (2026)
- [Automated Penetration Testing with LLM Agents and Classical Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11143/) (2025)
- [EvoDS: Self-Evolving Autonomous Data Science Agent with Skill Learning and Context Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03841/) (2026)
- [Human-Guided Agentic AI for Multimodal Clinical Prediction: Lessons from the AgentDS Healthcare Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19502/) (2026)
- [Agents That Know Too Much: A Data-Centric Survey of Privacy in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26627/) (2026)
- [Towards Reliable AI Data Scientists: Data Agents with Workflow Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35255/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled a new class of AI agents that automate multiple stages of the data science workflow by integrating planning, tool use, and multimodal reasoning across text, code, tables, and visuals. This survey presents the first comprehensive, lifecycle-aligned taxonomy of data science agents, systematically analyzing and mapping forty-five systems onto the six stages of the end-to-end data science process: business understanding and data acquisition, exploratory analysis and visualization, feature engineering, model building and selection, interpretation and explanation, and deployment and monitoring. In addition to lifecycle coverage, we annotate each agent along five cross-cutting design dimensions: reasoning and planning style, modality integration, tool orchestration depth, learning and alignment methods, and trust, safety, and governance mechanisms. Beyond classification, we provide a critical synthesis of agent capabilities, highlight strengths and limitations at each stage, and review emerging benchmarks and evaluation practices. Our analysis identifies three key trends: most systems emphasize exploratory analysis, visualization, and modeling while neglecting business understanding, deployment, and monitoring; multimodal reasoning and tool orchestration remain unresolved challenges; and over 90% lack explicit trust and safety mechanisms. We conclude by outlining open challenges in alignment stability, explainability, governance, and robust evaluation frameworks, and propose future research directions to guide the development of robust, trustworthy, low-latency, transparent, and broadly accessible data science agents.