# What Shapes a Creative Machine Mind? Comprehensively Benchmarking Creativity in Foundation Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04009 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04009/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13063/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05525/) (2024)
- [JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12784/) (2024)
- [NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05228/) (2025)
- [Putting GPT-3's Creativity to the (Alternative Uses) Test](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08932/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09007/) (2024)
- [Assessing and Understanding Creativity in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12491/) (2024)
- [MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09682/) (2023)
- [CreativEval: Evaluating Creativity of LLM-Based Hardware Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08806/) (2024)
- [Creation-MMBench: Assessing Context-Aware Creative Intelligence in MLLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14478/) (2025)
- [Shakespearean Sparks: The Dance of Hallucination and Creativity in LLMs' Decoding Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02851/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [EvoIdeator: Evolving Scientific Ideas through Checklist-Grounded Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21728/) (2026)
- [Where Models Converge and Humans Diverge: A Coverage Framework for Distributional Pluralism in Open-Ended Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05576/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The meteoric rise of foundation models (FMs) has expanded their capabilities far beyond conventional tasks. Creativity, long regarded as a hallmark of human intelligence and a driver of innovation, is now increasingly recognized as a critical dimension of machine intelligence in the era of generative FMs, complementing traditional measures of accuracy. However, existing evaluation frameworks for creativity remain fragmented, relying on ad hoc metrics not firmly grounded in established theories. To address this gap, we introduce C^2-Eval, a holistic benchmark for unified assessment of creativity in FMs. C^2-Eval distinguishes between two complementary forms of creativity: convergent creativity, where tasks admit constrained solutions (e.g., code generation), and divergent creativity, where tasks are open-ended (e.g., storytelling). It evaluates both dimensions using fine-grained criteria derived from social-science theory, focusing on Usefulness, Originality, and Surprise (U-O-S). Through extensive experiments on leading proprietary and open-source models, we analyze trade-offs in their creative capabilities. Our results highlight both the strengths and challenges of current FMs in pursuing a creative machine mind, showing that C^2-Eval is an effective lens for examining the evolving landscape of creative AI.