# The Signal is in the Steps: Local Scoring for Reasoning Data Selection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03988 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03988/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 41 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [Knowledge distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/knowledge-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Knowledge Distillation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05525/) (2020)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02301/) (2023)
- [Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03671/) (2019)
- [LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04333/) (2024)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18892/) (2025)
- [LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03387/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Data Selection for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16827/) (2024)
- [Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11566/) (2022)
- [Small Models Struggle to Learn from Strong Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12143/) (2025)
- [What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13954/) (2024)
- [AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13284/) (2025)
- [The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04194/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Which Reasoning Trajectories Teach Students to Reason Better? A Simple Metric of Informative Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14249/) (2026)
- [DTS: Enhancing Large Reasoning Models via Decoding Tree Sketching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00640/) (2025)
- [In Good GRACEs: Principled Teacher Selection for Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02833/) (2025)
- [Fine-Tuning Small Reasoning Models for Quantum Field Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.18936/) (2026)
- [Metacognitive Behavioral Tuning of Large Language Models for Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22508/) (2026)
- [MI-Distillation: Selecting from Model-Interpolated Instruct-Reasoning Data Spectrum for Chain-of-Thought Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29623/) (2026)
- [Which Medical Questions Deserve Rationales? Perturbation-Sensitive Selection for Robust QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09684/) (2026)
- [Learning More by Training Less: Uncertainty-Guided Progressive Contraction for Efficient Reasoning Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12933/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Distilling long-form reasoning from teacher models into smaller students requires selecting which candidate solutions to train on. Recent work argues that one should select responses the student model assigns highest probability, i.e., favoring solutions ``natural'' to the student. However, we find that this approach works within a single teacher but fails when scaling to long reasoning traces from multiple diverse teachers. We identify a key cause: this approach scores entire solutions, but students generalize by recombining familiar reasoning steps, not by memorizing complete solutions. Full-trajectory scoring optimizes the wrong target; it rewards global fluency while the transferable signal lies in local step transitions. We propose Local Average Log Probability (LALP), which scores each reasoning step using only a small window of preceding context, measuring whether each step is justified by its immediate premises rather than whether the full response looks natural to the student. LALP enables two practical use cases: selecting the best teacher before fine-tuning and curating training data from diverse teacher pools. Across math, coding, and science reasoning tasks, LALP consistently improves accuracy when selecting the most natural solutions by a large margin.