# Fine-Tuning on Noisy Instructions: Effects on Generalization and Performance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03528 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03528/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07705/) (2022)
- [Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08773/) (2021)
- [OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00838/) (2024)
- [ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09509/) (2022)
- [How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resources](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04751/) (2023)
- [The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01552/) (2023)
- [Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09279/) (2024)
- [A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06084/) (2018)
- [Data augmentation instead of explicit regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03852/) (2018)
- [Learning or Self-aligning? Rethinking Instruction Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18243/) (2024)
- [Improving Robustness of Machine Translation with Synthetic Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.09508/) (2019)
- [Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14221/) (2024)
- [Robustness of Learning from Task Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03813/) (2022)
- [MUFFIN: Curating Multi-Faceted Instructions for Improving Instruction-Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02436/) (2023)
- [Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00233/) (2023)
- [RobustFT: Robust Supervised Fine-tuning for Large Language Models under Noisy Response](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14922/) (2024)
- [Resilience of Large Language Models for Noisy Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09754/) (2024)
- [Contrastive Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11138/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [An Empirical Study on Preference Tuning Generalization and Diversity Under Domain Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05882/) (2026)
- [Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29144/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction-tuning plays a vital role in enhancing the task-solving abilities of large language models (LLMs), improving their usability in generating helpful responses on various tasks. However, previous work has demonstrated that they are sensitive to minor variations in instruction phrasing. In this paper, we explore whether introducing perturbations in instruction-tuning data can enhance LLMs' resistance against noisy instructions. We focus on how instruction-tuning with perturbations, such as removing stop words or shuffling words, affects LLMs' performance on the original and perturbed versions of widely-used benchmarks (MMLU, BBH, GSM8K). We further assess learning dynamics and potential shifts in model behavior. Surprisingly, our results suggest that instruction-tuning on perturbed instructions can, in some cases, improve downstream performance. These findings highlight the importance of including perturbed instructions in instruction-tuning, which can make LLMs more resilient to noisy user inputs.