# Assessing the Potential for Catastrophic Failure in Dynamic Post-Training Quantization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02457 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02457/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13719/) (2019)
- [Random Erasing Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04896/) (2017)
- [Designing Network Design Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13678/) (2020)
- [A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13630/) (2021)
- [Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11370/) (2019)
- [Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05442/) (2023)
- [Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10568/) (2020)
- [BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05426/) (2021)
- [HAQ: Hardware-Aware Automated Quantization with Mixed Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08886/) (2018)
- [Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14156/) (2021)
- [Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05237/) (2021)
- [QDrop: Randomly Dropping Quantization for Extremely Low-bit Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05740/) (2022)
- [PTQ4ViT: Post-training quantization for vision transformers with twin uniform quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12293/) (2021)
- [RepQ-ViT: Scale Reparameterization for Post-Training Quantization of Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08254/) (2022)
- [Overcoming Oscillations in Quantization-Aware Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11086/) (2022)
- [MobileNetV4 -- Universal Models for the Mobile Ecosystem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10518/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Model Quantization for Deep Neural Networks in Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07877/) (2022)
- [NoisyQuant: Noisy Bias-Enhanced Post-Training Activation Quantization for Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16056/) (2022)
- [Dynamic Network Quantization for Efficient Video Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10394/) (2021)
- [AdaLog: Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformers with Adaptive Logarithm Quantizer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12951/) (2024)
- [BiViT: Extremely Compressed Binary Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07091/) (2022)
- [Instance-Aware Group Quantization for Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00928/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training quantization (PTQ) has recently emerged as an effective tool for reducing the computational complexity and memory usage of a neural network by representing its weights and activations with lower precision. While this paradigm has shown great success in lowering compute and storage costs, there is the potential for drastic performance reduction depending upon the distribution of inputs experienced in inference. When considering possible deployment in safety-critical environments, it is important to investigate the extent of potential performance reduction, and what characteristics of input distributions may give rise to this reduction. In this work, we explore the idea of extreme failure stemming from dynamic PTQ and formulate a knowledge distillation and reinforcement learning task to learn a network and bit-width policy pair such that catastrophic failure under quantization is analyzed in terms of worst case potential. Our results confirm the existence of this "detrimental" network-policy pair, with several instances demonstrating performance reductions in the range of 10-65% in accuracy, compared to their "robust" counterparts encountering a <2% decrease. From systematic experimentation and analyses, we also provide an initial exploration into points at highest vulnerability. While our results represent an initial step toward understanding failure cases introduced by PTQ, our findings ultimately emphasize the need for caution in real-world deployment scenarios. We hope this work encourages more rigorous examinations of robustness and a greater emphasis on safety considerations for future works within the broader field of deep learning.