# Dynamic Jailbreaking Attack

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02422 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02422/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Jailbreaking](https://mlsanity.com/safety/jailbreaking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00614/) (2023)
- [Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05946/) (2024)
- [Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14132/) (2023)
- [AdvPrefix: An Objective for Nuanced LLM Jailbreaks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10321/) (2024)
- [MAJIC: Markovian Adaptive Jailbreaking via Iterative Composition of Diverse Innovative Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13048/) (2025)
- [DualBreach: Efficient Dual-Jailbreaking via Target-Driven Initialization and Multi-Target Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18564/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [TRACE: Task-Aware Adaptive Self-Evolving Agentic Jailbreaking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30883/) (2026)
- [NonTextual Target Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02999/) (2025)
- [REIN: Bridging the Gap between Reasoning and Reliability via Reflection and Abstention Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07931/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Existing gradient-based jailbreak attacks typically optimize a fixed-length adversarial suffix toward a predefined target response with a static optimization strategy. However, this fully static formulation undermines the effectiveness, efficiency and flexibility of gradient-based jailbreaking because (i) A predefined target usually lies in the low-probability region of a safety-aligned LLM's conditional output distribution, forcing the optimization to pursue an unlikely response pattern; (ii) Simple affirmative targets may even mislead LLMs to generate affirmative responses that are not highly relevant to the prompts; (iii) Fixed optimization strategy and suffix length treat all prompts equally, leading to limited attack capability for hard prompts and redundant capacity for easy ones. To address these limitations, we propose Dynamic Jailbreaking Attack (DJA), a parameter-free gradient-based jailbreak framework using dynamic candidate exploration, dynamic relevant targets and dynamic optimization strategy to craft adversarial prompts. In each optimization round, DJA samples multiple candidate target responses directly from the LLM's distribution conditioned on the current adversarial prompt. Among these candidates, DJA employs a multi-objective scorer to select an optimal target that satisfies multi-dimensional criteria such as harmfulness, relevance, and usefulness. Moreover, DJA introduces a parameter-free dynamic optimization strategy that allocates adversarial effort based on real-time feedback, adapting suffix length, candidate sampling capacity, and optimization iterations according to the difficulty of each harmful prompt. In an extensive evaluation of 40 safety-aligned LLMs (12 model families, scaling from 0.5B to 32B), DJA achieves a 100% ASR across all LLMs, requiring only 13.68 optimization rounds on average (10 iterations per round).