# Self-Supervised Representation Learning as Mutual Information Maximization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01345 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01345/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07733/) (2020)
- [Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10566/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09882/) (2020)
- [Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04297/) (2020)
- [Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03230/) (2021)
- [An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02057/) (2021)
- [Contrastive Multiview Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05849/) (2019)
- [Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06670/) (2018)
- [VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04906/) (2021)
- [Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02406/) (2015)
- [MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04062/) (2018)
- [On Variational Bounds of Mutual Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06922/) (2019)
- [On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.13625/) (2019)
- [Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06346/) (2020)
- [Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06810/) (2021)
- [A Cookbook of Self-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12210/) (2023)
- [Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06514/) (2021)
- [Understanding the Limitations of Variational Mutual Information Estimators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06222/) (2019)
- [How Does SimSiam Avoid Collapse Without Negative Samples? A Unified Understanding with Self-supervised Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16262/) (2022)
- [LVM-Med: Learning Large-Scale Self-Supervised Vision Models for Medical Imaging via Second-order Graph Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11925/) (2023)
- [The Mechanism of Prediction Head in Non-contrastive Self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06226/) (2022)
- [Self-Supervised Learning via Maximum Entropy Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11464/) (2022)
- [A Note on Connecting Barlow Twins with Negative-Sample-Free Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.13712/) (2021)
- [Towards Demystifying Representation Learning with Non-contrastive Self-supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04947/) (2021)
- [Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04858/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised representation learning (SSRL) has demonstrated remarkable empirical success, yet its underlying principles remain insufficiently understood. While recent works attempt to unify SSRL methods by examining their information-theoretic objectives or summarizing their heuristics for preventing representation collapse, architectural elements like predictor networks, stop-gradient operations, and statistical regularizers are often viewed as empirically motivated additions. In this paper, we adopt a first-principles approach and investigate whether the learning objective of an SSRL algorithm dictates its possible optimization strategies and model design choices. In particular, by starting from a variational mutual information (MI) lower bound, we derive two training paradigms, namely Self-Distillation MI (SDMI) and Joint MI (JMI), each imposing distinct structural constraints and covering a set of existing SSRL algorithms. SDMI relies on alternating optimization, in which stop-gradient operations serve as a principled mechanism for realizing the alternating updates. In contrast, JMI admits joint optimization through symmetric architectures without such components. Under the proposed formulation, predictor networks in SDMI and statistical regularizers in JMI emerge as tractable surrogates for the MI objective. We show that many existing SSRL methods are specific instances or approximations of these two paradigms. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the choices of different architectural components of existing SSRL methods, going beyond heuristic conveniences.