# Are Large Vision-Language Models Ready to Guide Blind and Low-Vision Individuals?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00766 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00766/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 25 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01390/) (2023)
- [RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13787/) (2024)
- [Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12845/) (2024)
- [Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17146/) (2024)
- [InternLM-XComposer2: Mastering Free-form Text-Image Composition and Comprehension in Vision-Language Large Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16420/) (2024)
- [VisionReward: Fine-Grained Multi-Dimensional Human Preference Learning for Image and Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21059/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02712/) (2024)
- [VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17451/) (2024)
- [InternLM-XComposer2.5-Reward: A Simple Yet Effective Multi-Modal Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12368/) (2025)
- [VIAssist: Adapting Multi-modal Large Language Models for Users with Visual Impairments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02508/) (2024)
- [Pairwise or Pointwise? Evaluating Feedback Protocols for Bias in LLM-Based Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14716/) (2025)
- [VIALM: A Survey and Benchmark of Visually Impaired Assistance with Large Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01735/) (2024)
- [G-VEval: A Versatile Metric for Evaluating Image and Video Captions Using GPT-4o](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13647/) (2024)
- [Pareto Multi-Objective Alignment for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07768/) (2025)
- [Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Vision-and-Language Evaluation and Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07336/) (2024)
- [WalkVLM:Aid Visually Impaired People Walking by Vision Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20903/) (2024)
- [Structured Modeling of Joint Deep Feature and Prediction Refinement for Salient Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04366/) (2019)
- [MGDA Converges under Generalized Smoothness, Provably](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19440/) (2024)
- [CHARM: Calibrating Reward Models With Chatbot Arena Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10045/) (2025)
- [BIV-Priv-Seg: Locating Private Content in Images Taken by People With Visual Impairments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18243/) (2024)
- [ObjectFinder: An Open-Vocabulary Assistive System for Interactive Object Search by Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03118/) (2024)
- [EMORL: Ensemble Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Efficient and Flexible LLM Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02579/) (2025)
- [Sightation Counts: Leveraging Sighted User Feedback in Building a BLV-aligned Dataset of Diagram Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13369/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Interpretable Debiasing of Vision-Language Models for Social Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.24014/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate a promising direction for assisting individuals with blindness or low-vision (BLV). Yet, measuring their true utility in real-world scenarios is challenging because evaluating whether their descriptions are BLV-informative requires a fundamentally different approach from assessing standard scene descriptions. While the "VLM-as-a-metric" or "LVLM-as-a-judge" paradigm has emerged, existing evaluators still fall short of capturing the unique requirements of BLV-centric evaluation, lacking at least one of the following key properties: (1) High correlation with human judgments, (2) Long instruction understanding, (3) Score generation efficiency, and (4) Multi-dimensional assessment. To this end, we propose a unified framework to bridge the gap between automated evaluation and actual BLV needs. First, we conduct an in-depth user study with BLV participants to understand and quantify their navigational preferences, curating VL-GUIDEDATA, a large-scale BLV user-simulated preference dataset containing image-request-response-score pairs. We then leverage the dataset to develop an accessibility-aware evaluator, VL-GUIDE-S, which outperforms existing (L)VLM judges in both human alignment and inference efficiency. Notably, its effectiveness extends beyond a single domain, demonstrating strong performance across multiple fine-grained, BLV-critical dimensions. We hope our work lays as a foundation for automatic AI judges that advance safe, barrier-free navigation for BLV users.