# Hearing the Order: Investigating Position Bias in Large Audio-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00628 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00628/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 41 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03299/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20215/) (2025)
- [Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01743/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03882/) (2023)
- [JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17631/) (2023)
- [The Impact of Positional Encoding on Length Generalization in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19466/) (2023)
- [Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18796/) (2024)
- [MMAU: A Massive Multi-Task Audio Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19168/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11483/) (2023)
- [AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07729/) (2024)
- [MMAR: A Challenging Benchmark for Deep Reasoning in Speech, Audio, Music, and Their Mix](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13032/) (2025)
- [Dynamic-SUPERB: Towards A Dynamic, Collaborative, and Comprehensive Instruction-Tuning Benchmark for Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09510/) (2023)
- [Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01432/) (2023)
- [Found in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts Better via Plug-and-Play Positional Encoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04797/) (2024)
- ["My Answer is C": First-Token Probabilities Do Not Match Text Answers in Instruction-Tuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14499/) (2024)
- [MMAU-Pro: A Challenging and Comprehensive Benchmark for Holistic Evaluation of Audio General Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13992/) (2025)
- [DeSTA2.5-Audio: Toward General-Purpose Large Audio Language Model with Self-Generated Cross-Modal Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02768/) (2025)
- [Voxtral](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13264/) (2025)
- [SAKURA: On the Multi-hop Reasoning of Large Audio-Language Models Based on Speech and Audio Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13237/) (2025)
- [Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15957/) (2025)
- [Never Lost in the Middle: Mastering Long-Context Question Answering with Position-Agnostic Decompositional Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09198/) (2023)
- [Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02743/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [MUGEN: Evaluating and Improving Multi-audio Understanding of Large Audio-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09714/) (2026)
- [HumMusQA: A Human-written Music Understanding QA Benchmark Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27877/) (2026)
- [Encoder-Side Neuron Identification and Amplification for Acoustic Perception in Large Audio-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11801/) (2026)
- [Broadening Uncertainty Estimation for Audio Question Answering Across Methods, Formats, and Inputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28879/) (2026)
- [Stable Scores, Unstable Answers: Frame Phase and Option Order in Video Multiple-Choice Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08649/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large audio-language models (LALMs) are often used in tasks that involve reasoning over ordered options. An open question is whether their predictions are influenced by the order of answer choices, which would indicate a form of position bias and undermine their reliability. In this paper, we identify and analyze this problem in LALMs. We demonstrate that no model is immune to this bias through extensive experiments on six LALMs across three widely used benchmarks and their spoken counterparts. Shuffling the order of answer options can cause performance fluctuations of up to 24% and even change model rankings, raising concerns about the reliability of current evaluation practices. We also study permutation-based strategies and show that they can mitigate bias in most cases. Our work represents the first systematic investigation of this issue in LALMs, and we hope it raises awareness and motivates further research in this direction.
