# AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00404 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00404/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 63 of its 88 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)
- Mechanistic interpretability / [SAE features and their applications](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/sae-features-and-their-applications/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 63)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08600/) (2023)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19647/) (2024)
- [Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09451/) (2019)
- [Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01610/) (2023)
- [Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14435/) (2024)
- [Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03952/) (2024)
- [AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17148/) (2025)
- [Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linear](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14860/) (2024)
- [Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12828/) (2021)
- [CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10154/) (2022)
- [Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.03764/) (2016)
- [A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14507/) (2024)
- [BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06410/) (2024)
- [SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09532/) (2025)
- [Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16681/) (2025)
- [InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12101/) (2024)
- [Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03714/) (2025)
- [Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01822/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.25234/) (2026)
- [Steering Without Breaking: Mechanistically Informed Interventions for Discrete Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10971/) (2026)
- [Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31245/) (2026)
- [Mechanistically Interpreting the Role of Sample Difficulty in RLVR for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28388/) (2026)
- [Can Cross-Layer Transcoders Replace Vision Transformer Activations? An Interpretable Perspective on Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13304/) (2026)
- [Sign-Aware Gated Sparse Autoencoders: Modeling Anticorrelated Features with Bi-Jump-ReLU Activations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28149/) (2026)
- [Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15054/) (2026)
- [Towards Fast and Disentangled Counterfactuals for Visual Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00895/) (2026)
- [One Token Can Be Enough: Bridging Prompting and Activation Steering with Prefix Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04967/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as powerful techniques for interpretability of large language models (LLMs), aiming to decompose hidden states into meaningful semantic features. While several SAE variants have been proposed, there remains no principled framework to derive SAEs from the original dictionary learning formulation. In this work, we introduce such a framework by unrolling the proximal gradient method for sparse coding. We show that a single-step update naturally recovers common SAE variants, including ReLU, JumpReLU, and TopK. Through this lens, we reveal a fundamental limitation of existing SAEs: their sparsity-inducing regularizers enforce non-negativity, preventing a single feature from representing bidirectional concepts (e.g., male vs. female). This structural constraint fragments semantic axes into separate, redundant features, limiting representational completeness. To address this issue, we propose AbsTopK SAE, a new variant derived from the ℓ0 sparsity constraint that applies hard thresholding over the largest-magnitude activations. By preserving both positive and negative activations, AbsTopK uncovers richer, bidirectional conceptual representations. Comprehensive experiments across four LLMs and seven probing and steering tasks show that AbsTopK improves reconstruction fidelity, enhances interpretability, and enables single features to encode contrasting concepts. Remarkably, AbsTopK matches or even surpasses the Difference-in-Mean method, a supervised approach that requires labeled data for each concept and has been shown in prior work to outperform SAEs.