# MAVUL: Multi-Agent Vulnerability Detection via Contextual Reasoning and Interactive Refinement

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00317 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00317/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08155/) (2020)
- [Devign: Effective Vulnerability Identification by Learning Comprehensive Program Semantics via Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03496/) (2019)
- [Vulnerability Detection with Code Language Models: How Far Are We?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18624/) (2024)
- [DiverseVul: A New Vulnerable Source Code Dataset for Deep Learning Based Vulnerability Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00409/) (2023)
- [LLMs Cannot Reliably Identify and Reason About Security Vulnerabilities (Yet?): A Comprehensive Evaluation, Framework, and Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12575/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Models for Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15223/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model-Powered Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: New Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01152/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection: Emerging Results and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15468/) (2024)
- [Combining Fine-Tuning and LLM-based Agents for Intuitive Smart Contract Auditing with Justifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16073/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting of Large Language Models for Discovering and Fixing Software Vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17230/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03586/) (2025)
- [Let the Trial Begin: A Mock-Court Approach to Vulnerability Detection using LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10961/) (2025)
- [Multi-role Consensus through LLMs Discussions for Vulnerability Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14274/) (2024)
- [Pre-training by Predicting Program Dependencies for Vulnerability Analysis Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00657/) (2024)
- [Everything You Wanted to Know About LLM-based Vulnerability Detection But Were Afraid to Ask](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13474/) (2025)
- [LLM-SmartAudit: Advanced Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09381/) (2024)
- [EvalSVA: Multi-Agent Evaluators for Next-Gen Software Vulnerability Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14737/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Pre-trained Language Models for Vulnerability Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16887/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [From SFT to RL: Demystifying the Post-Training Pipeline for LLM-based Vulnerability Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14012/) (2026)
- [VULPO: Context-Aware Vulnerability Detection via On-Policy LLM Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.11896/) (2025)
- [AEGIS: From Clues to Verdicts -- Graph-Guided Deep Vulnerability Reasoning via Dialectics and Meta-Auditing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20637/) (2026)
- [SPECA: Specification-to-Checklist Agentic Auditing for Multi-Implementation Systems -- A Case Study on Ethereum Clients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07513/) (2026)
- [Verify Before You Fix: Agentic Execution Grounding for Trustworthy Cross-Language Code Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10800/) (2026)
- [Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19049/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread adoption of open-source software (OSS) necessitates the mitigation of vulnerability risks. Most vulnerability detection (VD) methods are limited by inadequate contextual understanding, restrictive single-round interactions, and coarse-grained evaluations, resulting in undesired model performance and biased evaluation results. To address these challenges, we propose MAVUL, a novel multi-agent VD system that integrates contextual reasoning and interactive refinement. Specifically, a vulnerability analyst agent is designed to flexibly leverage tool-using capabilities and contextual reasoning to achieve cross-procedural code understanding and effectively mine vulnerability patterns. Through iterative feedback and refined decision-making within cross-role agent interactions, the system achieves reliable reasoning and vulnerability prediction. Furthermore, MAVUL introduces multi-dimensional ground truth information for fine-grained evaluation, thereby enhancing evaluation accuracy and reliability. Extensive experiments conducted on a pairwise vulnerability dataset demonstrate MAVUL's superior performance. Our findings indicate that MAVUL significantly outperforms existing multi-agent systems with over 62% higher pairwise accuracy and single-agent systems with over 600% higher average performance. The system's effectiveness is markedly improved with increased communication rounds between the vulnerability analyst agent and the security architect agent, underscoring the importance of contextual reasoning in tracing vulnerability flows and the crucial feedback role. Additionally, the integrated evaluation agent serves as a critical, unbiased judge, ensuring a more accurate and reliable estimation of the system's real-world applicability by preventing misleading binary comparisons.