# CEAID: Benchmark of Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Methods for Central European Languages

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26051 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.26051/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05130/) (2023)
- [Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12070/) (2024)
- [RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07940/) (2024)
- [MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13242/) (2023)
- [Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15666/) (2023)
- [Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01583/) (2022)
- [IMGTB: A Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12574/) (2023)
- [Increasing the Robustness of the Fine-tuned Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15128/) (2025)
- [Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts for English, French, German, and Spanish](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04882/) (2023)
- [Crafting Tomorrow's Headlines: Neural News Generation and Detection in English, Turkish, Hungarian, and Persian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10724/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [MultiGhostBench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Long-Form LLM-Generated Text Attribution under Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02379/) (2026)
- [Unchecked or Falsely Accused? Evaluating AI-Generated Text Detectors on Kazakh](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15870/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-generated text detection, as an important task, is predominantly focused on English in research. This makes the existing detectors almost unusable for non-English languages, relying purely on cross-lingual transferability. There exist only a few works focused on any of Central European languages, leaving the transferability towards these languages rather unexplored. We fill this gap by providing the first benchmark of detection methods focused on this region, while also providing comparison of train-languages combinations to identify the best performing ones. We focus on multi-domain, multi-generator, and multilingual evaluation, pinpointing the differences of individual aspects, as well as adversarial robustness of detection methods. Supervised finetuned detectors in the Central European languages are found the most performant in these languages as well as the most resistant against obfuscation.