# Putnam-like dataset summary: LLMs as mathematical competition contestants

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24827 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24827/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23281/) (2025)
- [Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07985/) (2024)
- [FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04872/) (2024)
- [PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11214/) (2024)
- [Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Proving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23726/) (2025)
- [Winning Gold at IMO 2025 with a Model-Agnostic Verification-and-Refinement Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15855/) (2025)
- [Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21934/) (2025)
- [FIMO: A Challenge Formal Dataset for Automated Theorem Proving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.04295/) (2023)
- [The Open Proof Corpus: A Large-Scale Study of LLM-Generated Mathematical Proofs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21621/) (2025)
- [Brains vs. Bytes: Evaluating LLM Proficiency in Olympiad Mathematics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01995/) (2025)
- [Putnam-AXIOM: A Functional and Static Benchmark for Measuring Higher Level Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08292/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00674/) (2026)
- [Not All Proofs Are Equal: Evaluating LLM Proof Quality Beyond Correctness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10379/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we summarize the results of the Putnam-like benchmark published by Google DeepMind. This dataset consists of 96 original problems in the spirit of the Putnam Competition and 576 solutions generated by LLMs. We analyze the performance of models on this set of problems to verify their ability to solve problems from mathematical contests. We find that top models, particularly Gemini 2.5 Pro, achieve high scores, demonstrating strong mathematical reasoning capabilities, although their performance was lower on problems from the 2024 Putnam competition. The analysis highlights distinct behavioral patterns among models, including bimodal scoring distributions and challenges in providing fully rigorous justifications.