# CoFFT: Chain of Foresight-Focus Thought for Visual Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22010 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22010/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17580/) (2023)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04671/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.07895/) (2024)
- [Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14804/) (2024)
- [MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Action](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11381/) (2023)
- [V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14135/) (2023)
- [VisionZip: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04467/) (2024)
- [We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01284/) (2024)
- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18521/) (2024)
- [InternVideo2.5: Empowering Video MLLMs with Long and Rich Context Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12386/) (2025)
- [MLLMs Know Where to Look: Training-free Perception of Small Visual Details with Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17422/) (2025)
- [Compositional Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17076/) (2023)
- [M3CoT: A Novel Benchmark for Multi-Domain Multi-step Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16473/) (2024)
- [MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11779/) (2024)
- [MoVA: Adapting Mixture of Vision Experts to Multimodal Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13046/) (2024)
- [CogCoM: A Visual Language Model with Chain-of-Manipulations Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04236/) (2024)
- [Mind's Eye of LLMs: Visualization-of-Thought Elicits Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03622/) (2024)
- [T-SciQ: Teaching Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Mixed Large Language Model Signals for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03453/) (2023)
- [PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12054/) (2025)
- [Predicting Goal-directed Human Attention Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14310/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [OptiVerse: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Optimization Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21510/) (2026)
- [MAGA: Multi-Platform Self-Fusion of GUI Agents via Structured Action Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.29320/) (2026)
- [A3-Bench: Benchmarking Memory-Driven Scientific Reasoning via Anchor and Attractor Activation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09274/) (2026)
- [Knowing Isn't Always Saying: When Do Spatial Encodings Reach Answers in Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22916/) (2026)
- [Dual-Cluster Memory Agent: Resolving Multi-Paradigm Ambiguity in Optimization Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20183/) (2026)
- [ChronoVision: Temporal Reasoning via Latent State Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05631/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite significant advances in Vision Language Models (VLMs), they remain constrained by the complexity and redundancy of visual input. When images contain large amounts of irrelevant information, VLMs are susceptible to interference, thus generating excessive task-irrelevant reasoning processes or even hallucinations. This limitation stems from their inability to discover and process the required regions during reasoning precisely. To address this limitation, we present the Chain of Foresight-Focus Thought (CoFFT), a novel training-free approach that enhances VLMs' visual reasoning by emulating human visual cognition. Each Foresight-Focus Thought consists of three stages: (1) Diverse Sample Generation: generates diverse reasoning samples to explore potential reasoning paths, where each sample contains several reasoning steps; (2) Dual Foresight Decoding: rigorously evaluates these samples based on both visual focus and reasoning progression, adding the first step of optimal sample to the reasoning process; (3) Visual Focus Adjustment: precisely adjust visual focus toward regions most beneficial for future reasoning, before returning to stage (1) to generate subsequent reasoning samples until reaching the final answer. These stages function iteratively, creating an interdependent cycle where reasoning guides visual focus and visual focus informs subsequent reasoning. Empirical results across multiple benchmarks using Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL-2.5, and Llava-Next demonstrate consistent performance improvements of 3.1-5.8% with controllable increasing computational overhead.