# PQFed: A Privacy-Preserving Quality-Controlled Federated Learning Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21704 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21704/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07873/) (2019)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02079/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04263/) (2021)
- [An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04088/) (2020)
- [Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01991/) (2019)
- [Personalized Federated Learning: A Meta-Learning Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07948/) (2020)
- [Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10616/) (2023)
- [Geometric Dataset Distances via Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02923/) (2020)
- [On the Convergence of Local Descent Methods in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14425/) (2019)
- [LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03637/) (2020)
- [FedBalancer: Data and Pace Control for Efficient Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Clients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01601/) (2022)
- [FedBR: Improving Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data via Local Learning Bias Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13462/) (2022)
- [Make Landscape Flatter in Differentially Private Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11242/) (2023)
- [FedSDG-FS: Efficient and Secure Feature Selection for Vertical Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10417/) (2023)
- [FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02310/) (2021)
- [Scalable and Privacy-Preserving Federated Principal Component Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00129/) (2023)
- [Privacy-Preserving and Efficient Verification of the Outcome in Genome-Wide Association Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08879/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, but data heterogeneity consistently challenges the performance of the global model. Traditional optimization methods often rely on collaborative global model training involving all clients, followed by local adaptation to improve individual performance. In this work, we focus on early-stage quality control and propose PQFed, a novel privacy-preserving personalized federated learning framework that designs customized training strategies for each client prior to the federated training process. PQFed extracts representative features from each client's raw data and applies clustering techniques to estimate inter-client dataset similarity. Based on these similarity estimates, the framework implements a client selection strategy that enables each client to collaborate with others who have compatible data distributions. We evaluate PQFed on two benchmark datasets, CIFAR-10 and MNIST, integrated with three existing federated learning algorithms. Experimental results show that PQFed consistently improves the target client's model performance, even with a limited number of participants. We further benchmark PQFed against a baseline cluster-based algorithm, IFCA, and observe that PQFed also achieves better performance in low-participation scenarios. These findings highlight PQFed's scalability and effectiveness in personalized federated learning settings.