# SciTrek: Evaluating and Improving Long-Context Numerical Reasoning over Scientific Articles

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21028 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21028/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14508/) (2023)
- [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06654/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10813/) (2024)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15204/) (2024)
- [L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11088/) (2023)
- [BABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10149/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-1M Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15383/) (2025)
- [Break It Down: A Question Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.11770/) (2020)
- [Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17419/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Long Context Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17407/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards: GRPO's Effective Loss, Dynamics, and Success Amplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06639/) (2025)
- [OpenScholar: Synthesizing Scientific Literature with Retrieval-augmented LMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14199/) (2024)
- [Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22828/) (2025)
- [LIFBench: Evaluating the Instruction Following Performance and Stability of Large Language Models in Long-Context Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07037/) (2024)
- [Ada-LEval: Evaluating long-context LLMs with length-adaptable benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06480/) (2024)
- [MoNaCo: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.11133/) (2025)
- [MathHay: An Automated Benchmark for Long-Context Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04698/) (2024)
- [Holistic Reasoning with Long-Context LMs: A Benchmark for Database Operations on Massive Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11996/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Long-Context Reasoning Through Proxy-Based Chain-of-Thought Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20201/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce SciTrek, a synthetic question-answering dataset for assessing and improving long-context numerical reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Existing long-context datasets with inputs beyond 64K tokens either target simple information retrieval or, when they do involve reasoning, rely on artificial contexts, while numerical reasoning remains largely overlooked in both cases. SciTrek addresses these limitations with questions that require numerical operations (e.g., counting, sorting, aggregation, and comparison) over collections of full-text scientific articles. Questions are generated automatically by formulating them as SQL queries over a database of article metadata (titles, authors, and references), and ground-truth answers are obtained by executing these queries. The underlying SQL provides a transparent, verifiable specification of the reasoning each question requires, enabling fine-grained error analysis. Furthermore, the proposed fully automated pipeline scales to arbitrary context lengths and dataset sizes with minimal human supervision, mitigating data contamination and supplying abundant data for post-training. Extensive experiments show that frontier open-weight and proprietary LLMs struggle even with ostensibly simple questions: the best-performing model achieves only 46.5% exact match at 128K tokens, and performance degrades steadily as contexts grow. Fine-grained analysis reveals systematic weaknesses on citation-related questions and on compound logical conditions, particularly those involving negation. Finally, post-training open-weight models on SciTrek improves their numerical reasoning in ways that generalise to out-of-domain long-context tasks.