# MACD: Multi-Agent Clinical Diagnosis with Self-Learned Knowledge for LLM

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20067 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20067/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13081/) (2020)
- [PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06146/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07927/) (2024)
- [MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16079/) (2023)
- [HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18925/) (2024)
- [Diagnostic Reasoning Prompts Reveal the Potential for Large Language Model Interpretability in Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06834/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Disease Diagnosis: A Scoping Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00097/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07399/) (2023)
- [Small Language Models Learn Enhanced Reasoning Skills from Medical Textbooks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00376/) (2024)
- [Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03194/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [MedGuideX: Internalizing Decision Logic from Executable Guidelines into Large Language Models for Clinical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26567/) (2026)
- [Joint Optimization of Reasoning and Dual-Memory for Self-Learning Diagnostic Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07269/) (2026)
- [Emulating Clinician Cognition via Self-Evolving Deep Clinical Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10677/) (2026)
- [The Path to Self-Evolving Clinical Systems: Scaling Medical Agents from Assistance to Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11175/) (2026)
- [A safety-oriented hypothetico-deductive framework for AI-assisted differential diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08038/) (2026)
- [Social Chain of Thought: A Multi-Agent Architecture Grounded in Medical Differential Diagnosis Methodology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11420/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in supporting medical diagnosis, with prompting-based methods offering a flexible and deployable means of capability enhancement. However, existing prompt engineering and multi-agent approaches often focus on optimizing single inferences, paying less attention to the accumulation of reusable experience from clinical practice, constraining their real-world applicability. To address this, this study proposes a novel Multi-Agent Clinical Diagnosis (MACD) framework, which allows LLMs to self-learn clinical knowledge via a multi-agent pipeline that summarizes, refines, and applies diagnostic insights, mirroring the professional development of human physicians. We further extend it to a MACD-human collaborative workflow, where multiple LLM-based diagnostician agents engage in iterative consultations, supported by a judge agent and human oversight for cases where agreement is not reached. The MIMIC-MACD cohort comprising 4,390 real-world patient cases across seven diseases is constructed, including 1,314 cases for knowledge learning and 3,076 held-out cases for evaluation. Across diverse open-weight LLMs, MACD significantly improves primary diagnostic accuracy, achieving an average improvement of 11.6 percentage points over established authoritative knowledge, while narrowing the performance gap between open-weight models and state-of-the-art LLMs. Furthermore, the MACD-human workflow yields an 18.3-percentage-point improvement over physician-only diagnosis on text-only vignettes, demonstrating the synergistic potential of human-AI collaboration. This work thus presents a scalable self-learning paradigm that bridges the gap between the intrinsic knowledge of LLMs and the demands of real-world clinical practice, advancing towards a reliable, interpretable, and deployable AI-assisted diagnosis.
