# Nano Bio-Agents (NBA): Small Language Model Agents for Genomics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19566 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19566/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Augmented Language Models: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07842/) (2023)
- [GeneGPT: Augmenting Large Language Models with Domain Tools for Improved Access to Biomedical Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09667/) (2023)
- [Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08979/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Evaluating Agentic Bioinformatics through Function, Evidence, and Validation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27556/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the application of Small Language Models (<10 billion parameters) for genomics question answering via agentic framework to address hallucination issues and computational cost challenges. The Nano Bio-Agent (NBA) framework we implemented incorporates task decomposition, tool orchestration, and API access into well-established systems such as NCBI and AlphaGenome. Results show that SLMs combined with such agentic framework can achieve comparable and in many cases superior performance versus existing approaches utilising larger models, with our best model-agent combination achieving 98% accuracy on the GeneTuring benchmark. Notably, small 3-10B parameter models consistently achieve 85-97% accuracy while requiring much lower computational resources than conventional approaches. This demonstrates promising potential for efficiency gains, cost savings, and democratization of ML-powered genomics tools while retaining highly robust and accurate performance.