# On the Convergence of Policy Mirror Descent with Temporal Difference Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18822 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18822/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 38 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Learning Quadrupedal Locomotion over Challenging Terrain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11251/) (2020)
- [Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08117/) (2022)
- [A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11275/) (2019)
- [StarCraft II: A New Challenge for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04782/) (2017)
- [On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.06392/) (2020)
- [Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01150/) (2019)
- [Policy Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning: Linear Convergence, New Sampling Complexity, and Generalized Problem Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00135/) (2021)
- [A Two-Timescale Framework for Bilevel Optimization: Complexity Analysis and Application to Actor-Critic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05170/) (2020)
- [On the Convergence Rates of Policy Gradient Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07443/) (2022)
- [Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02769/) (2019)
- [Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02151/) (2020)
- [Mirror Descent Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.09814/) (2020)
- [Policy Mirror Descent for Regularized Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Framework with Linear Convergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11066/) (2021)
- [A general sample complexity analysis of vanilla policy gradient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.11433/) (2021)
- [An Improved Analysis of (Variance-Reduced) Policy Gradient and Natural Policy Gradient Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07937/) (2022)
- [Stochastic Policy Gradient Methods: Improved Sample Complexity for Fisher-non-degenerate Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01734/) (2023)
- [On Linear Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for Finite MDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.11120/) (2020)
- [Softmax Policy Gradient Methods Can Take Exponential Time to Converge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11270/) (2021)
- [On the Linear convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01424/) (2021)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Advantage-Based Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09110/) (2021)
- [Linear Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Log-Linear Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01400/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Non-uniformity in First-order Non-convex Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06072/) (2021)
- [Non-asymptotic Convergence Analysis of Two Time-scale (Natural) Actor-Critic Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03557/) (2020)
- [Finite Sample Analysis of Two-Time-Scale Natural Actor-Critic Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.10506/) (2021)
- [Stochastic first-order methods for average-reward Markov decision processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05800/) (2022)
- [A Novel Framework for Policy Mirror Descent with General Parameterization and Linear Convergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13139/) (2023)
- [Finite-Sample Analysis of Off-Policy Natural Actor-Critic Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09318/) (2021)
- [Improved Sample Complexity Analysis of Natural Policy Gradient Algorithm with General Parameterization for Infinite Horizon Discounted Reward Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11677/) (2023)
- [Optimal Convergence Rate for Exact Policy Mirror Descent in Discounted Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11381/) (2023)
- [Elementary Analysis of Policy Gradient Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03372/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Policy Mirror Descent with Temporal Difference Learning: Sample Complexity under Online Markov Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.24056/) (2025)
- [PolicyAttention: Softmax Attention Implements Policy Mirror Descent for Closed-Loop Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30500/) (2026)
- [Fast Regularized Policy Mirror Descent with One-Step TD Updates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39837/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Policy mirror descent (PMD) is a general policy optimization framework in reinforcement learning, which can cover a wide range of typical policy optimization methods by specifying different mirror maps. Existing analysis of PMD requires exact or approximate evaluation (for example unbiased estimation via Monte Carlo simulation) of action values solely based on policy. In this paper, we consider policy mirror descent with temporal difference evaluation (TD-PMD). It is shown that, given the access to exact policy evaluations, the dimension-free O(1/T) sublinear convergence still holds for TD-PMD with any constant step size and any initialization. In order to achieve this result, new monotonicity and shift invariance arguments have been developed. The dimension free γ-rate linear convergence of TD-PMD is also established provided the step size is selected adaptively. For the two common instances of TD-PMD (i.e., TD-PQA and TD-NPG), it is further shown that they enjoy the convergence in the policy domain. Additionally, we investigate TD-PMD in the inexact setting and give the sample complexity for it to achieve the last iterate varepsilon-optimality under a generative model, which improves the last iterate sample complexity for PMD over the dependence on 1/(1-γ).
