# Similarity Field Theory: A Mathematical Framework for Intelligence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18218 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18218/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06681/) (2023)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21509/) (2025)
- [Scaling Laws and Interpretability of Learning from Repeated Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10487/) (2022)
- [Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Cluster](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03208/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We posit that transforming similarity relations form the structural basis of comprehensible dynamic systems. This paper introduces Similarity Field Theory, a mathematical framework that formalizes the principles governing similarity values among entities and their evolution. We define: (1) a similarity field S: U × U → [0,1] over a universe of entities U, satisfying reflexivity S(E,E)=1 and treated as a directed relational field (asymmetry and non-transitivity are allowed); (2) the evolution of a system through a sequence Zp=(Xp,S(p)) indexed by p=0,1,2,ldots; (3) concepts K as entities that induce fibers Fα(K)=E∈ U mid S(E,K)≥ α, i.e., superlevel sets of the unary map SK(E):=S(E,K); and (4) a generative operator G that produces new entities. Within this framework, we formalize a generative definition of intelligence: an operator G is intelligent with respect to a concept K if, given a system containing entities belonging to the fiber of K, it generates new entities that also belong to that fiber. Similarity Field Theory thus offers a foundational language for characterizing, comparing, and constructing intelligent systems. At a high level, this framework reframes intelligence and interpretability as geometric problems on similarity fields--preserving and composing level-set fibers--rather than statistical ones. We prove two theorems: (i) asymmetry blocks mutual inclusion; and (ii) stability implies either an anchor coordinate or asymptotic confinement to the target level (up to arbitrarily small tolerance). Together, these results constrain similarity-field evolution and motivate an interpretive lens applicable to large language models. AI systems may be aligned less to safety as such than to human-observable and human-interpretable conceptions of safety, which may not fully determine the underlying safety concept.