# Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18076 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18076/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Tool learning and function calling](https://mlsanity.com/agents/tool-learning-and-function-calling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15408/) (2023)
- [ToolkenGPT: Augmenting Frozen Language Models with Massive Tools via Tool Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11554/) (2023)
- [ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00920/) (2024)
- [AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16653/) (2023)
- [Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15402/) (2023)
- [A Review of Prominent Paradigms for LLM-Based Agents: Tool Use (Including RAG), Planning, and Feedback Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05804/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Small LLMs: What Works and What Doesn't](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16219/) (2025)
- [Making Language Models Better Tool Learners with Execution Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13068/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06193/) (2025)
- [Confucius: Iterative Tool Learning from Introspection Feedback by Easy-to-Difficult Curriculum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14034/) (2023)
- [On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14296/) (2025)
- [MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17231/) (2024)
- [LLM-Generated Black-box Explanations Can Be Adversarially Helpful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06800/) (2024)
- [Synthesize Step-by-Step: Tools, Templates and LLMs as Data Generators for Reasoning-Based Chart VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16385/) (2024)
- [ToolScan: A Benchmark for Characterizing Errors in Tool-Use LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13547/) (2024)
- [Divide-or-Conquer? Which Part Should You Distill Your LLM?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15000/) (2024)
- [Challenges in Ensuring AI Safety in DeepSeek-R1 Models: The Shortcomings of Reinforcement Learning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17030/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [ASA: Backbone-Training-Free Representation Engineering for Tool-Calling Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04935/) (2026)
- [Natural Language Tools: A Natural Language Approach to Tool Calling In Large Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14453/) (2025)
- [Open, Reliable, and Collective: A Community-Driven Framework for Tool-Using AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00137/) (2026)
- [Towards Universal Calibration for In-Context Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17096/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities, yet they often fail in real-world tool-interactions due to incorrect parameterization, poor tool selection, or misinterpretation of user intent. These issues often stem from an incomplete understanding of user goals and inadequate comprehension of tool documentation. While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has proven effective for enhancing reasoning in general contexts, our analysis reveals that free-form CoT is insufficient and sometimes counterproductive for structured function-calling tasks. To address this, we introduce a curriculum-inspired framework that leverages structured reasoning templates to guide LLMs through more deliberate step-by-step instructions for generating function callings. Experimental results show that our method reduces tool-use errors, achieving 3-12% relative improvements over strong baselines across diverse model series and approaches. Moreover, our framework enhances the robustness, interpretability, and transparency of tool-using agents, advancing the development of more reliable AI assistants for real-world applications.