# FlagEval Findings Report: A Preliminary Evaluation of Large Reasoning Models on Automatically Verifiable Textual and Visual Questions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17177 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17177/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 36 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21187/) (2024)
- [Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05410/) (2025)
- [Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11926/) (2025)
- [Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01307/) (2025)
- [Measuring short-form factuality in large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04368/) (2024)
- [The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06941/) (2025)
- [MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23281/) (2025)
- [Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11473/) (2025)
- [WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18510/) (2024)
- [Why Language Models Hallucinate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04664/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23918/) (2025)
- [AbstentionBench: Reasoning LLMs Fail on Unanswerable Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09038/) (2025)
- [ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12185/) (2024)
- [ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15915/) (2023)
- [Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15553/) (2024)
- [MindCube: Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21458/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's think about LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07128/) (2025)
- [Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08156/) (2025)
- [When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11423/) (2025)
- [From Hard Refusals to Safe-Completions: Toward Output-Centric Safety Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09224/) (2025)
- [Inverse Scaling in Test-Time Compute](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14417/) (2025)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Complex Tasks: Where We Stand and What Lies Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00294/) (2025)
- [The Hallucination Tax of Reinforcement Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13988/) (2025)
- [Understanding Tool-Integrated Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19201/) (2025)
- [ChartMuseum: Testing Visual Reasoning Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13444/) (2025)
- [RBench-V: A Primary Assessment for Visual Reasoning Models with Multi-modal Outputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16770/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Do Vision-Language Models Measure Up? Benchmarking Visual Measurement Reading with MeasureBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26865/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We conduct a moderate-scale contamination-free (to some extent) evaluation of current large reasoning models (LRMs) with some preliminary findings. We also release ROME, our evaluation benchmark for vision language models intended to test reasoning from visual clues. We attach links to the benchmark, evaluation data, and other updates on this website: https://flageval-baai.github.io/LRM-Eval/