# Dynamic Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance via Online Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16131 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16131/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 31 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Diffusion and multimodal model alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/diffusion-and-multimodal-model-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10741/) (2021)
- [Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15343/) (2023)
- [PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06794/) (2022)
- [Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00704/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01291/) (2024)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [Applying Guidance in a Limited Interval Improves Sample and Distribution Quality in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07724/) (2024)
- [TextDiffuser: Diffusion Models as Text Painters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10855/) (2023)
- [A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06848/) (2025)
- [GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13743/) (2024)
- [CADS: Unleashing the Diversity of Diffusion Models through Condition-Annealed Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17347/) (2023)
- [What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10400/) (2023)
- [Refining Generative Process with Discriminator Guidance in Score-based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.17091/) (2022)
- [Test-time Alignment of Diffusion Models without Reward Over-optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05803/) (2025)
- [Restart Sampling for Improving Generative Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14878/) (2023)
- [Analysis of Classifier-Free Guidance Weight Schedulers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13040/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Text-to-Image Evaluation with Gecko: On Metrics, Prompts, and Human Ratings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16820/) (2024)
- [If at First You Don't Succeed, Try, Try Again: Faithful Diffusion-based Text-to-Image Generation by Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13308/) (2023)
- [Consistency-diversity-realism Pareto fronts of conditional image generative models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10429/) (2024)
- [Scaling Pre-training to One Hundred Billion Data for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07617/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Numerical Reasoning in Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14774/) (2024)
- [Diffusion Rejection Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17880/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Learn to Guide Your Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00815/) (2025)
- [Early Estimation of Language to Latent Alignment in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08505/) (2025)
- [Momentum Guidance: Plug-and-Play Guidance for Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20360/) (2026)
- [GuidedBridge: Training-freely Improving Bridge Models with Prior Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03119/) (2026)
- [VAGS: Velocity Adaptive Guidance Scale for Image Editing and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15661/) (2026)
- [DualEraser: Joint Video Object and Effect Removal via Balanced Text-Mask Guidance and Decoupled Locator-Preserver](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30045/) (2026)
- [Learning Sampling Parameters for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23488/) (2026)
- [PromptLoop: Plug-and-Play Prompt Refinement via Latent Feedback for Diffusion Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00430/) (2025)
- [Cross-modal Consistency Guidance for Robust Emotion Control in Auto-Regressive TTS Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13293/) (2025)
- [Guidance Is Not a Hyperparameter: Learning Dynamic Control in Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07701/) (2026)
- [Compositional Video Generation via Inference-Time Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14988/) (2026)
- [Correcting Guided Diffusion Trajectories with Spectral Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02753/) (2026)
- [TrajCFG: Token-Wise Classifier-Free Guidance via Denoising Trajectory Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14153/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Classifier-free guidance (CFG) is a cornerstone of text-to-image diffusion models, yet its effectiveness is limited by the use of static guidance scales. This "one-size-fits-all" approach fails to adapt to the diverse requirements of different prompts; moreover, prior solutions like gradient-based correction or fixed heuristic schedules introduce additional complexities and fail to generalize. In this work, we challeng this static paradigm by introducing a framework for dynamic CFG scheduling. Our method leverages online feedback from a suite of general-purpose and specialized small-scale latent-space evaluations, such as CLIP for alignment, a discriminator for fidelity and a human preference reward model, to assess generation quality at each step of the reverse diffusion process. Based on this feedback, we perform a greedy search to select the optimal CFG scale for each timestep, creating a unique guidance schedule tailored to every prompt and sample. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on both small-scale models and the state-of-the-art Imagen 3, showing significant improvements in text alignment, visual quality, text rendering and numerical reasoning. Notably, when compared against the default Imagen 3 baseline, our method achieves up to 53.8% human preference win-rate for overall preference, a figure that increases up to to 55.5% on prompts targeting specific capabilities like text rendering. Our work establishes that the optimal guidance schedule is inherently dynamic and prompt-dependent, and provides an efficient and generalizable framework to achieve it.
