# Efficient Hate Speech Detection: Evaluating 38 Models from Traditional Methods to Transformers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14266 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14266/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00596/) (2019)
- [ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11942/) (2019)
- [Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1408.5882/) (2014)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.05118/) (2018)
- [Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08914/) (2016)
- [Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04257/) (2018)
- [A C-LSTM Neural Network for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.08630/) (2015)
- [Deep Learning for Detecting Cyberbullying Across Multiple Social Media Platforms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.06482/) (2018)
- [Detection of Hate Speech using BERT and Hate Speech Word Embedding with Deep Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01515/) (2021)
- ["Subverting the Jewtocracy": Online Antisemitism Detection Using Multimodal Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05947/) (2021)
- [Multi-modal Hate Speech Detection using Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11519/) (2023)
- [A Comparative Analysis of Transformer and LSTM Models for Detecting Suicidal Ideation on Reddit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15404/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [HateXScore: A Metric Suite for Evaluating Reasoning Quality in Hate Speech Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13547/) (2026)
- [LinGO: A Linguistic Graph Optimization Framework with LLMs for Interpreting Intents of Online Uncivil Discourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04693/) (2026)
- [Multiclass Hate Speech Detection with RoBERTa-OTA: Integrating Transformer Attention and Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04414/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of hate speech on social media necessitates automated detection systems that balance accuracy with computational efficiency. This study evaluates 38 model configurations in detecting hate speech across datasets ranging from 6.5K to 451K samples. We analyze transformer architectures (e.g., BERT, RoBERTa, Distil-BERT), deep neural networks (e.g., CNN, LSTM, GRU, Hierarchical Attention Networks), and traditional machine learning methods (e.g., SVM, CatBoost, Random Forest). Our results show that transformers, particularly RoBERTa, consistently achieve superior performance with accuracy and F1-scores exceeding 90%. Among deep learning approaches, Hierarchical Attention Networks yield the best results, while traditional methods like CatBoost and SVM remain competitive, achieving F1-scores above 88% with significantly lower computational costs. Additionally, our analysis highlights the importance of dataset characteristics, with balanced, moderately sized unprocessed datasets outperforming larger, preprocessed datasets. These findings offer valuable insights for developing efficient and effective hate speech detection systems.
