# Textarium: Entangling Annotation, Abstraction and Argument

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13191 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13191/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.04606/) (2016)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Patterns of Text Reuse in a Scientific Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.2716/) (2014)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a web-based environment that connects annotation, abstraction, and argumentation during the interpretation of text. As a visual interface for scholarly reading and writing, Textarium combines human analysis with lightweight computational processing to bridge close and distant reading practices. Readers can highlight text, group keywords into concepts, and embed these observations as anchors in essays. The interface renders these interpretive actions as parameterized visualization states. Through a speculative design process of co-creative and iterative prototyping, we developed a reading-writing approach that makes interpretive processes transparent and shareable within digital narratives.