# Quantum parameter estimation with uncertainty quantification from continuous measurement data using neural network ensembles

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10756 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.10756/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [Deep Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06114/) (2017)
- [Natural Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07174/) (2019)
- [Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02530/) (2019)
- [Mixed Precision Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03740/) (2017)
- [A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03342/) (2021)
- [Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11953/) (2018)
- [Why M Heads are Better than One: Training a Diverse Ensemble of Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06314/) (2015)
- [Explainability through uncertainty: Trustworthy decision-making with neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10168/) (2024)
- [Fast and reliable uncertainty quantification with neural network ensembles for industrial image classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10182/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Quality of the Quantified Uncertainty for (Re)Calibration of Data-Driven Regression Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17761/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We show that ensembles of deep neural networks, called deep ensembles, can be used to perform quantum parameter estimation while also providing a means for quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates, which is a key advantage of using Bayesian inference for parameter estimation that is lost when using existing machine learning methods. We show that optimizing for both accurate parameter estimates and well calibrated uncertainty estimates does not lead to degradation in the former as opposed to only optimizing for accuracy. We also show that the drift detection capabilities of these ensemble models can be used to detect drift in the experimental data used during inference. This approach is also shown to provide much faster inference time than both likelihood-based and likelihood-free Bayesian inference. These results suggest that such models could enable accurate, real-time parameter estimation with quantified uncertainty, making them promising candidates for deployment in experimental settings.
