# A Lightweight Ensemble-Based Face Image Quality Assessment Method with Correlation-Aware Loss

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10114 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.10114/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08958/) (2022)
- [NIMA: Neural Image Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.05424/) (2017)
- [Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02665/) (2019)
- [TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03060/) (2023)
- [SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.09373/) (2020)
- [Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01103/) (2020)
- [CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06592/) (2021)
- [Quality-Aware Image-Text Alignment for Opinion-Unaware Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11176/) (2024)
- [Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01019/) (2020)
- [IFQA: Interpretable Face Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07077/) (2022)
- [A Deep Insight into Measuring Face Image Utility with General and Face-specific Image Quality Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11111/) (2021)
- [VQualA 2025 Challenge on Face Image Quality Assessment: Methods and Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18445/) (2025)
- [A Study on the Impact of Face Image Quality on Face Recognition in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02679/) (2023)
- [Recent Advances in Rate Control: From Optimisation to Implementation and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10815/) (2022)
- [Accuracy and Fairness of Facial Recognition Technology in Low-Quality Police Images: An Experiment With Synthetic Faces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14320/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Face image quality assessment (FIQA) plays a critical role in face recognition and verification systems, especially in uncontrolled, real-world environments. Although several methods have been proposed, general-purpose no-reference image quality assessment techniques often fail to capture face-specific degradations. Meanwhile, state-of-the-art FIQA models tend to be computationally intensive, limiting their practical applicability. We propose a lightweight and efficient method for FIQA, designed for the perceptual evaluation of face images in the wild. Our approach integrates an ensemble of two compact convolutional neural networks, MobileNetV3-Small and ShuffleNetV2, with prediction-level fusion via simple averaging. To enhance alignment with human perceptual judgments, we employ a correlation-aware loss (MSECorrLoss), combining mean squared error (MSE) with a Pearson correlation regularizer. Our method achieves a strong balance between accuracy and computational cost, making it suitable for real-world deployment. Experiments on the VQualA FIQA benchmark demonstrate that our model achieves a Spearman rank correlation coefficient (SRCC) of 0.9829 and a Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC) of 0.9894, remaining within competition efficiency constraints.
