# WALL: A Web Application for Automated Quality Assurance using Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09918 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09918/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01020/) (2022)
- [Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11147/) (2024)
- [Prompt-Enhanced Software Vulnerability Detection Using ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12697/) (2023)
- [Unveiling LLM Evaluation Focused on Metrics: Challenges and Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09135/) (2024)
- [Experimenting with Multi-Agent Software Development: Towards a Unified Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05381/) (2024)
- [Sorald: Automatic Patch Suggestions for SonarQube Static Analysis Violations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12033/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As software projects become increasingly complex, the volume and variety of issues in code files have grown substantially. Addressing this challenge requires efficient issue detection, resolution, and evaluation tools. This paper presents WALL, a web application that integrates SonarQube and large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4o to automate these tasks. WALL comprises three modules: an issue extraction tool, code issues reviser, and code comparison tool. Together, they enable a seamless pipeline for detecting software issues, generating automated code revisions, and evaluating the accuracy of revisions. Our experiments, conducted on 563 files with over 7,599 issues, demonstrate WALL's effectiveness in reducing human effort while maintaining high-quality revisions. Results show that employing a hybrid approach of cost-effective and advanced LLMs can significantly lower costs and improve revision rates. Future work aims to enhance WALL's capabilities by integrating open-source LLMs and eliminating human intervention, paving the way for fully automated code quality management.