# Fusing Knowledge and Language: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Graph-Based Question Answering with LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09272 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09272/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08896/) (2023)
- [Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08302/) (2023)
- [Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01061/) (2023)
- [Learning on Large-scale Text-attributed Graphs via Variational Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14709/) (2022)
- [GraphFormers: GNN-nested Transformers for Representation Learning on Textual Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02605/) (2021)
- [GNN-RAG: Graph Neural Retrieval for Large Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20139/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Graph Meets Large Language Model: Progress and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12399/) (2023)
- [Retrieve-Rewrite-Answer: A KG-to-Text Enhanced LLMs Framework for Knowledge Graph Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11206/) (2023)
- [Text Summarization Techniques: A Brief Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.02268/) (2017)
- [LeanContext: Cost-Efficient Domain-Specific Question Answering Using LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00841/) (2023)
- [Adaptive Information Seeking for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06747/) (2021)
- [Train Your Own GNN Teacher: Graph-Aware Distillation on Textual Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10668/) (2023)
- [Pretraining Language Models with Text-Attributed Heterogeneous Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12580/) (2023)
- [Prompt Tuning on Graph-augmented Low-resource Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10230/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge graphs, a powerful tool for structuring information through relational triplets, have recently become the new front-runner in enhancing question-answering systems. While traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches are proficient in fact-based and local context-based extraction from concise texts, they encounter limitations when addressing the thematic and holistic understanding of complex, extensive texts, requiring a deeper analysis of both text and context. This paper presents a comprehensive technical comparative study of three different methodologies for constructing knowledge graph triplets and integrating them with Large Language Models (LLMs) for question answering: spaCy, Stanford CoreNLP-OpenIE, and GraphRAG, all leveraging open source technologies. We evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and adaptability of these methods by analyzing their capabilities, state of development, and their impact on the performance of LLM-based question answering. Experimental results indicate that while OpenIE provides the most comprehensive coverage of triplets, GraphRAG demonstrates superior reasoning abilities among the three. We conclude with a discussion on the strengths and limitations of each method and provide insights into future directions for improving knowledge graph-based question answering.
