# Too Helpful, Too Harmless, Too Honest or Just Right?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08486 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08486/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [MoE large language models](https://mlsanity.com/moe/moe-large-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12773/) (2023)
- [Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05374/) (2023)
- [LLaMA-MoE: Building Mixture-of-Experts from LLaMA with Continual Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16554/) (2024)
- [Uni-MoE: Scaling Unified Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11273/) (2024)
- [Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02416/) (2024)
- [Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01586/) (2024)
- [Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15997/) (2023)
- [Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning:A Winning Combination for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14705/) (2023)
- [(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01864/) (2024)
- [Analyzing and Reducing Catastrophic Forgetting in Parameter Efficient Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18865/) (2024)
- [Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00212/) (2023)
- [Read-ME: Refactorizing LLMs as Router-Decoupled Mixture of Experts with System Co-Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19123/) (2024)
- [MoCaE: Mixture of Calibrated Experts Significantly Improves Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14976/) (2023)
- [TurnBench-MS: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Turn, Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01341/) (2025)
- [H3Fusion: Helpful, Harmless, Honest Fusion of Aligned LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17792/) (2024)
- [Should LLM Safety Be More Than Refusing Harmful Instructions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02442/) (2025)
- [Steering Towards Fairness: Mitigating Political Bias in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08846/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [We Think, Therefore We Align LLMs to Helpful, Harmless and Honest Before They Go Wrong](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22510/) (2025)
- [AlignCultura: Towards Culturally Aligned Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19016/) (2026)
- [Do Large Language Models Reflect Demographic Pluralism in Safety?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07376/) (2026)
- [When the Model Said 'No Comment', We Knew Helpfulness Was Dead, Honesty Was Alive, and Safety Was Terrified](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07381/) (2026)
- [Can Large Language Models Make Everyone Happy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11091/) (2026)
- [Are Aligned Large Language Models Still Misaligned?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11305/) (2026)
- [Magic, Madness, Heaven, Sin: LLM Output Diversity is Everything, Everywhere, All at Once](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01504/) (2026)
- [Selective Safety Steering via Value-Filtered Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14746/) (2026)
- [Pak3H: Evaluating the Cost of Cultural Mismatch in LLM Alignment with a Human-Contextualized Urdu Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30065/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong performance across a wide range of NLP tasks, yet aligning their outputs with the principles of Helpfulness, Harmlessness, and Honesty (HHH) remains a persistent challenge. Existing methods often optimize for individual alignment dimensions in isolation, leading to trade-offs and inconsistent behavior. While Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures offer modularity, they suffer from poorly calibrated routing, limiting their effectiveness in alignment tasks. We propose TrinityX, a modular alignment framework that incorporates a Mixture of Calibrated Experts (MoCaE) within the Transformer architecture. TrinityX leverages separately trained experts for each HHH dimension, integrating their outputs through a calibrated, task-adaptive routing mechanism that combines expert signals into a unified, alignment-aware representation. Extensive experiments on three standard alignment benchmarks-Alpaca (Helpfulness), BeaverTails (Harmlessness), and TruthfulQA (Honesty)-demonstrate that TrinityX outperforms strong baselines, achieving relative improvements of 32.5% in win rate, 33.9% in safety score, and 28.4% in truthfulness. In addition, TrinityX reduces memory usage and inference latency by over 40% compared to prior MoE-based approaches. Ablation studies highlight the importance of calibrated routing, and cross-model evaluations confirm TrinityX's generalization across diverse LLM backbones.