# Tracing and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multimodal LLMs via Dynamic Attention Localization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07864 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07864/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 40 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10592/) (2023)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [Shikra: Unleashing Multimodal LLM's Referential Dialogue Magic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15195/) (2023)
- [Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14525/) (2023)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17911/) (2023)
- [DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03883/) (2023)
- [Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06394/) (2023)
- [Paying More Attention to Image: A Training-Free Method for Alleviating Hallucination in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21771/) (2024)
- [HALC: Object Hallucination Reduction via Adaptive Focal-Contrast Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00425/) (2024)
- [Devils in Middle Layers of Large Vision-Language Models: Interpreting, Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Attention Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16724/) (2024)
- [See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03321/) (2025)
- [Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06968/) (2023)
- [MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11779/) (2024)
- [Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06287/) (2025)
- [DAMRO: Dive into the Attention Mechanism of LVLM to Reduce Object Hallucination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04514/) (2024)
- [Nullu: Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via HalluSpace Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13817/) (2024)
- [Geometric Visual Similarity Learning in 3D Medical Image Self-supervised Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00874/) (2023)
- [Locate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06331/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Repeat Curse in Large Language Models from a Feature Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14218/) (2025)
- [ASCD: Attention-Steerable Contrastive Decoding for Reducing Hallucination in MLLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14766/) (2025)
- [Multi-hop Question Answering under Temporal Knowledge Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00492/) (2024)
- [Model Editing as a Robust and Denoised variant of DPO: A Case Study on Toxicity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13967/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Benchmarking and Mitigating Sycophancy in Medical Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21979/) (2025)
- [Towards Reasoning-Preserving Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17911/) (2025)
- [CounterCount: A Diagnostic Framework for Counting Bias in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17826/) (2026)
- [SFAD: Speculative Factuality-Aware Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00796/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on tasks like image captioning and visual question answering, but remain prone to hallucinations, where generated text conflicts with the visual input. Prior work links this partly to insufficient visual attention, but existing attention-based detectors and mitigation typically apply uniform adjustments across layers and heads, obscuring where errors originate. In this paper, we first show these methods fail to accurately localize problematic layers. Then, we introduce two diagnostics: Layer Image Attention Entropy (LIAE) which flags anomalous layers, and Image Attention Focus (IAF) which scores attention heads within those layers. Analysis shows that LIAE pinpoints faulty layers and IAF reliably ranks heads that warrant correction. Guided by these signals, we propose Dynamic Layer-wise Entropy and Attention Fusion (D-LEAF), a task-agnostic, attention-guided method that dynamically localizes and corrects errors during inference with negligible overhead. Furthermore, by establishing a connection between D-LEAF and DPO, we provide theoretical justification for the effectiveness of D-LEAF. Results show our D-LEAF delivers a 53% relative improvement on standard captioning benchmarks, and on VQA both accuracy and F1-score improve by approximately 4%, substantially suppressing hallucinations while preserving efficiency.
