# floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RL

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06863 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06863/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 77 of its 85 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 77)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08415/) (2016)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08265/) (2019)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02900/) (2018)
- [Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05905/) (2018)
- [Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09991/) (2022)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06860/) (2021)
- [Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00949/) (2019)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13264/) (2021)
- [Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00177/) (2019)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12114/) (2018)
- [Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11361/) (2019)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02039/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Policies as an Expressive Policy Class for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06193/) (2022)
- [TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16828/) (2023)
- [Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10044/) (2017)
- [Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04955/) (2022)
- [Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01307/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [TQL: Scaling Q-Functions with Transformers by Preventing Attention Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01439/) (2026)
- [Q-Flow: Stable and Expressive Reinforcement Learning with Flow-Based Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13435/) (2026)
- [DeFlow: Decoupling Manifold Modeling and Value Maximization for Offline Policy Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10471/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Value Gradient Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14265/) (2026)
- [Scalable Maximum Entropy Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Policies via Adjoint Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22630/) (2026)
- [ReFORM: Reflected Flows for On-support Offline RL via Noise Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05051/) (2026)
- [GoldenStart: Q-Guided Priors and Entropy Control for Distilling Flow Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14245/) (2026)
- [Causal Flow Q-Learning for Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02847/) (2026)
- [What Does Flow Matching Bring To TD Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04333/) (2026)
- [Refining Compositional Diffusion for Reliable Long-Horizon Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03075/) (2026)
- [Path-Coupled Bellman Flows for Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08253/) (2026)
- [Reversal Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.17551/) (2026)
- [Posterior Augmented Flow Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00825/) (2026)
- [Quantile-Coupled Flow Matching for Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08515/) (2026)
- [RAMAC: Multimodal Risk-Aware Offline Reinforcement Learning and the Role of Behavior Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02695/) (2025)
- [Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Diffusion Bridge Critics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05783/) (2026)
- [DFPO: Scaling Value Modeling via Distributional Flow towards Robust and Generalizable LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05890/) (2026)
- [Horizon Adaptive Offline Policy Learning via Value Stitching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21136/) (2026)
- [Retimed Bellman Flows: Escaping the Impossible Triangle of Velocity Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32828/) (2026)
- [Flowing Faster to Coordinate: One-Step Online Multi-Agent Flow Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.01882/) (2026)
- [LASER: Latent Space Adjoint Matching for Support-Constrained Entropy-Regularized Offline RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08989/) (2026)
- [Posterior-Averaged Bellman Flow Matching for Distributional Critics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17788/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A hallmark of modern large-scale machine learning techniques is the use of training objectives that provide dense supervision to intermediate computations, such as teacher forcing the next token in language models or denoising step-by-step in diffusion models. This enables models to learn complex functions in a generalizable manner. Motivated by this observation, we investigate the benefits of iterative computation for temporal difference (TD) methods in reinforcement learning (RL). Typically they represent value functions in a monolithic fashion, without iterative compute. We introduce floq (flow-matching Q-functions), an approach that parameterizes the Q-function using a velocity field and trains it using techniques from flow-matching, typically used in generative modeling. This velocity field underneath the flow is trained using a TD-learning objective, which bootstraps from values produced by a target velocity field, computed by running multiple steps of numerical integration. Crucially, floq allows for more fine-grained control and scaling of the Q-function capacity than monolithic architectures, by appropriately setting the number of integration steps. Across a suite of challenging offline RL benchmarks and online fine-tuning tasks, floq improves performance by nearly 1.8x. floq scales capacity far better than standard TD-learning architectures, highlighting the potential of iterative computation for value learning.
